originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
I'm currently reading Robert Hughes's superbly written The Fatal Shore, about the settling of Australia, and the percentage of people addicted to rum (standing for any hard liquor) was quite astonishing back in the day. In comparison, I suspect that the per capita social cost of drinking in the more developed societies has probably never been as low as it is today. Thanks, in part, to the slow drift away from whiskey, gin and vodka towards wine, beer, and cider, due to our unflagging efforts. But to the relatives of any DUI victims they remain, of course, unacceptably high.
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
"expensive" or "excessive" ?
originally posted by kirk wallace:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
"expensive" or "excessive" ?
NB: From the article: "Binge drinking is defined as consuming four or more alcoholic beverages per occasion for women or five or more drinks per occasion for men, and is the most common form of excessive alcohol consumption in the United States."
I guess the jeebus could be renamed Bing-o.
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by kirk wallace:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
"expensive" or "excessive" ?
NB: From the article: "Binge drinking is defined as consuming four or more alcoholic beverages per occasion for women or five or more drinks per occasion for men, and is the most common form of excessive alcohol consumption in the United States."
I guess the jeebus could be renamed Bing-o.
The problem with that classification is that it neglects the time involved. Is a dinner in which 8 wines are served over the course of a 4 hour meal to be considered binge drinking? If 8 people are present at that dinner, individual consumption amounts to 750 ml per person, which would amount to 5.25 standard drinks.
Mark Lipton