originally posted by Cliff:
Maybe it was just an excuse, but I heard it at the estate, not from people in the U.S.
originally posted by fatboy:
originally posted by Cliff:
Maybe it was just an excuse, but I heard it at the estate, not from people in the U.S.
shrug. i'd imagine that the estate would prefer you believed that they had a batch of dodgy corks (now taken care of, or course) than that their importers regularly casserole the product.
like jonathan, i have never had the slightest problem with corks on my (domain sourced) 81s (nor even on the much lamer, later bottled versions of the 81 that i scored in london -- joe may recall an ironically "pristine" bottle of this cuvvee that was a perfect example of its mediocrity...)
fb.
is there any limestone in denmark?
I like the sulfured '09 Lapierres well enough too (not tried the '10's yet, except raisin du gaul) but the sans soufre is pretty much a different wine anyway. Seems to be consistently leaner and less overtly carbonicky ripe in comparison to the sulfured releases....which makes it just right for the '09 vintage imho.originally posted by Yixin:
I really like the 2009s from Lapierre, but prefer the 2010s.
We lucked out in Chicago and got the '10 Lapierres in pretty early. I've gone through three of them already. I absolutely love it. Though I was talking with someone in Michigan about them and they were saying that the ones in MI weren't showing that well. I noticed that the ones he had were bottled on a different date and were the regular Kermit Lynch imports (the ones that come into Chicago are brought in by Michael Corso). They probably just need some time to unwind. The bottles I've had have been downed at breakneck speeds though.originally posted by Joel Stewart:
I like the sulfured '09 Lapierres well enough too (not tried the '10's yet, except raisin du gaul) but the sans soufre is pretty much a different wine anyway. Seems to be consistently leaner and less overtly carbonicky ripe in comparison to the sulfured releases....which makes it just right for the '09 vintage imho.originally posted by Yixin:
I really like the 2009s from Lapierre, but prefer the 2010s.
originally posted by Yixin:
The unsulfured was showing better on the 3rd day.
originally posted by Joel Stewart:
I like the sulfured '09 Lapierres well enough too (not tried the '10's yet, except raisin du gaul) but the sans soufre is pretty much a different wine anyway. Seems to be consistently leaner and less overtly carbonicky ripe in comparison to the sulfured releases....which makes it just right for the '09 vintage imho.originally posted by Yixin:
I really like the 2009s from Lapierre, but prefer the 2010s.
originally posted by Joel Stewart:
Yeah, that is too bad to hear Brad. Is questionable provenance a recurrent theme for you left coasters? Seems I've heard grumblings from various folks on occasion.
Fwiw, I picked up my '09 normales from Crush and had them shipped in during cool weather last year. They've all been fine wines.
originally posted by BJ:
Is my hyphen on twins' in the wrong place in the title? I hate rules. Someone do compliance for me.
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by BJ:
Is my hyphen on twins' in the wrong place in the title? I hate rules. Someone do compliance for me.
You're cool. There is more than one twin, correct? And they both possess powers? If so, you're off the hook, Brad.
Mark Lipton