TN: End of year dinner- "Bring something good."

Brad Kane

Brad Kane
Almost every year for the past six or so years, I get together with a small group of friends for a "bring something good" end of year dinner. On Tuesday, December 6th, that tradition continued when Greg dal Piaz, Izzy Nosnik, Chris Kravitz and Bill Lawrence and I convened at Beacon Restaurant for a night of revelry. Good food + good wine + good friends= great night!

2008 Foreau- Vouvray Demi-Sec Domaine du Clos Naudin - France, Loire Valley, Touraine, Vouvray
Nowhere near as forward and exhilarating as previous bottles. Perhaps slightly off, or starting to shut down? It shows its typical quince and mineral profile, but lacks the exotic gingery note it's previously shown. It's also exhibiting more of an apple character. While a nice match with the crab bisque, overall the wine seemed a bit muted. A-/B+, though six previous bottles have merited an A/A- to an A.

1998 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
Showing so much better than a bottle a year ago, this was an absolute treat. It's extremely floral on the nose with a fields worth of violets to go along with the meat, fur and peppery black and red fruit. Youthful on the palate with chewy tannins and nice acid levels, but despite its brawn, the wine has a Burgundian elegance to it. The fruit is ripe, but not jammy and there's more of a beef blood character to it than bacon. Just great balance, depth and purity here and a real joy to drink, though additional cellar time should see more secondary development than is currently showing. A.

1989 Chateau Angélus - France, Bordeaux, Libournais, St. Émilion Grand Cru
A real shame here. When I first opened this up to double decant at home, it smelled beautiful and was full of sweet red fruit, truffles and herbs. A quick taste showed a silky quality with like flavors. However, several hours later when the wine was served, it was a shell of its former self. The exuberance had left it, it was a little hard on the attack, it displayed no length and was cranky on the finish. By the end of the evening the faint whiff of tca started to emerge confirming the problem. A real shame too as this wine never fails to deliver when intact. My first corked bottle out of ten that I purchased and only one bottle left. NR (flawed)

1989 Chateau Ausone - France, Bordeaux, Libournais, St. Émilion Grand Cru
From a disappointing period in the estate's history and it shows. The wine revealed little on the nose and was one-note on the palate. Simple, with diluted red fruit and cedar, the acidity is high, but despite that, the wine lacks vitality and is bereft of personality. That said, it's a perfectly fine drop that's akin to a solid, non-descript red that might be poured at a cocktail party, but one expects a lot more given the pedigree, vintage and price. B+/B.

1989 Chateau Palmer - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
What a wine! If it hadn't been for the Monfortino, this would've taken wine of the night honors for me. It shows remarkable purity, depth and concentration, but the balance is impeccable. Black fruit in character, with plums, currants and a bit of cedar and mineral, it just seduces you with its rich, yet velvety mouthfeel. It's just hitting the beginings of peak, but shows youthfully, so while there's every reason to open one now, there's a lot more development to go. One of my favorites from the estate and I wish I had some in the cellar. Solid A.

1989 Chateau Mouton Rothschild - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
This was largely considered a dog for the vintage on release and it's never particularly impressed me the four or five times I've had it over the years and tonight it's showing as usual. It's rustic, high acid and chunky in style with an extracted feel to it, but without any richness or enough fruit to fully back it up. Red cherry and red currants on the palate with a touch of herb and earth as well as mint and coffee from the oak that still needs to integrate further. It's showing a bit better than the Ausone, but like the Ausone, given the vintage, Ch“teau and price, one expects a lot more. B+/A-.

1982 Giacomo Conterno- Barolo Riserva Monfortino - Italy, Piedmont, Langhe, Barolo
At this same end of year dinner two years ago, Greg also brought this bottle, but, alas, that bottle was corked. Thankfully, this one wasn't. In fact, it would turn out to be my wine of the year. This is what Barolo strives to be. It's a powerhouse of a wine that's endlessly complex and layered, dynamic and full throttle, yet somehow manages to stay suave and show elegance. Double decanted at 3:00 pm and consumed starting around 8:30-9:00 pm, the wine showed a mostly black profile with its fruit, olive, tar and anise character, but some red fruit joined in once in the glass a bit. Rich and full, but silky with tannins lurking in the background until they started to become a bit bossy later in the evening. Greg calls it a sexy wine if you like women wearing black leather who can throw you around the room. Outstanding. Solid A+.

1995 Huët- Vouvray Cuvée Constance - France, Loire Valley, Touraine, Vouvray
A great way to end a wonderful evening. No longer painfully young, but certainly still youthful, this is actually a rather showy bottle. Intense, expansive and with great length, the wine is bursting with orange marmalade, apricot, bergamot and mineral flavors and aromas and picks up some marzipan after being opened awhile. Quite sweet, but it has riveting acidity that keeps everything perfectly balanced. Solid A.
 
originally posted by Brad Kane:


1989 Chateau Ausone - France, Bordeaux, Libournais, St. Émilion Grand Cru
From a disappointing period in the estate's history and it shows.
Really?

Tell us more.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Brad Kane:


1989 Chateau Ausone - France, Bordeaux, Libournais, St. Émilion Grand Cru
From a disappointing period in the estate's history and it shows.
Really?

Tell us more.

I'm not saying the modern stuff is particularly good, either. But, the estate seems to have cult followers of the period when they struggled because they were typically high acid, thin and under fruited and they have cult followers of their current extracted style. Me? I'm a follower of their '59.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
When would you say their disappointing period began and ended?

I'd say '65-'94, of course with a couple exceptions, was a pretty weak period for them. I'm not much of a fan of their spoof era since '95, but at least the wines are a lot more consistent.
 
Just because the handful of folks on the secret Sasha board happen to like the underfruited high acid style, doesn't mean you are correct. If you want Burgundy, drink Burgundy. Bordeaux ain't supposed to be Burgundy.
 
originally posted by gregory dal piaz:
it was a thoroughly unremarkable wine
I'm totally prepared to believe you guys had a bottle that wasn't so tasty. Parenthetically, it is a little early to be drinking '89 Ausone, IMHO.

It's more the magisterial extrapolation from that bottle to 30 years of wine that chafes.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by gregory dal piaz:
it was a thoroughly unremarkable wine

It's more the magisterial extrapolation from that bottle to 30 years of wine that chafes.

It's ok, Joe. I'm friends with a number of wine apologists, many of whom reside here.
 
As soon as I stop giggling and my eyes cease watering I might consider making a comment. Naw, sometimes perfect comedy cannot be improved on.
 
I know I'll never make the Sasha wine board with the comments I'm about to write, but what the hell I've been banned from better places. There is a modicum of truth in what Kane says (a resounding chorus of boos greets the ears) there was a period of time when the wines of Ausone were not up to snuff. They were not terrible for the vintage but they really were not anything special. I remember attending a 82 tasting where Ausone finished in the middle of the pack and none of the wine professionals disagreed. If the right coast received great wines in the period Kane alludes to you were luckier than those of us who reside on the left coast.
Why not Kane, even the "blind pig finds etc etc." but I want him to know I may not agree with him on anything again. Now my conscience is clear and I meet the New Year greeted kindly by the Gods. It was not easy.
Happy New Year to the one friend I may have left on this board.
 
OK, that's it Lou, you're done.

No, not really.

But Ausone takes longer than anything else to come around IME. And it has a very different profile when it does.
 
Joe, the decline of Ausone is matter of public record. Read just about any history of the domaine online. Most will say they declined the second half of of the century until Delbeck got there in '76, but even then, they were inconsistent until Rolland introduced spoof in '95.
 
Back
Top