Oz lovers will regard this as a ridiculous question but, with the exception of some 20+ year Grange met in a vertical, my euro-centric palate has been consistently disappointed. Here is another one which avoids the caricatures but fails to convince.
Adelaide Hills Shiraz 2007 Shaw and Smith Alc.14.5% - (22 EUR). I seem to recall the seller telling me that there was Viognier on the blend but I can find no confirmation of that on the S&S website.
Even before my first sip, I heard Germaine saying “I don’t like this”. I would be less harsh but it still doesn’t convince me that South Australia is the right place for Shiraz/Syrah, even though my least favourite features of many, such as blowsy blueberry, mint, burning alcohol and burgeoning American oak, were mercifully absent.
On the nose there were quite highly scented aromas of soft red fruit (some strawberry), spices and flowers but somehow they did not appeal in the same way as strong cheap perfume fails to appeal. The palate was medium bodied with decent sweetish fruit diminished by the same highly scented aromas, smooth acidity, soft texture, some milk chocolate and a gentle finish without much tannic support. This may appeal to some but I found it lacking in grip, tension and structure which, for me, are essential for a good food wine. We didn’t finish the bottle; 14/20.
Adelaide Hills Shiraz 2007 Shaw and Smith Alc.14.5% - (22 EUR). I seem to recall the seller telling me that there was Viognier on the blend but I can find no confirmation of that on the S&S website.
Even before my first sip, I heard Germaine saying “I don’t like this”. I would be less harsh but it still doesn’t convince me that South Australia is the right place for Shiraz/Syrah, even though my least favourite features of many, such as blowsy blueberry, mint, burning alcohol and burgeoning American oak, were mercifully absent.
On the nose there were quite highly scented aromas of soft red fruit (some strawberry), spices and flowers but somehow they did not appeal in the same way as strong cheap perfume fails to appeal. The palate was medium bodied with decent sweetish fruit diminished by the same highly scented aromas, smooth acidity, soft texture, some milk chocolate and a gentle finish without much tannic support. This may appeal to some but I found it lacking in grip, tension and structure which, for me, are essential for a good food wine. We didn’t finish the bottle; 14/20.