Ian Fitzsimmons
Ian Fitzsimmons
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
If it's an unintended consequence of the winemaker's normal so3 treatment, is it still spoof? Must intent be shown in order to convict?
??
Did you read the passage?
No one adds SO2 in the ordinary course at 2,3,4% abv during fermentation, 15 ppm each. It isn't done.
He pats himself on the back for his cleverness, which he's entitled to do IMO. But your suggestion of indadvertence flummoxes me.
It's SO2 in this case, btw.
Sorry to flummox you. I assumed some glycerol would be produced, or its production enhanced, by the presence of any residual SO2 present in the must during fermentation. Perhaps I assumed too much, and any SO2 added early on in the process for other purposes would no longer be available to bind the acetaldehyde at the critical moment.
Anyway, I wrote in the spirit of a jesting quip only.