TN: Chave night with the Gelbs.

Brad Kane

Brad Kane
Marshall and Diana Gelb were in town for their annual visit to our fair city and once again some of the natives rolled out the welcome mat and tucked fine bottles of wine under their arms in welcome. Christine Huang and Marty Ellington welcomed them, Paul and Sandy Jaouen, Suzanne Camhi and Kenny Shusterman and me to their new Harlem digs for a night of great fun. Christine once again outdid herself in the kitchen, cooking up a feast that included goat cheese and caramelized onion crostada, pike quenelles, daube Provencal and a pear tart where the pears were poached in an '83 Climens that apparently showed too much oxidation. Marshall mentioned that, like last year, he was bringing a '90 Chave, Paul quickly piped in with the '88 and a Chave theme was formed. With company, food and wine like that, the only possible outcome can be a great time and indeed it was!

1998 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage Blanc - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
The first bottle opened was oxidized. A second bottle was opened and showed much fresher, but also showed a lightly oxidized, nutty character. Rich and relatively low acid with stone fruits, honey, spice and citrus notes with just a bit too much butterscotch/oak for my tastes. Just not my style of wine with the low acid and oak profile. B/B+.

2000 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage Blanc - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
Corked. NR (flawed)

2001 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage Blanc - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
Starts off with a lot of sulfur on the nose that eventually blew off to reveal apricot, honeysuckle, spice and herbal aromas. It's a more vibrant and better balanced and integrated wine than the '98, with similar flavors as aromas on the palate. The nuttiness here doesn't make the wine seem advanced as it did on the '98, but rather enhances the flavor profile. Oily mouthfeel with a long, butterscotch finish. Again, not my style of wine, but well made and classy. Solid B+.

1989 Paul Jaboulet Aîné- Hermitage La Chapelle - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
A typical showing for this wine, pleasant enough, but no real sparks or personality. Again, aromatically it continues to inspire before the relative letdown on the palate. It's always very pretty on the nose with bright red cherry and raspberry fruit, light meat and olive notes with a bit of garrigue, but on the palate the fruit is always a bit lacking and the acidity just a bit too wild. The palate does show some nice bark and licorice notes, but the finish is a bit chunky. Completely outclassed by the '88 Chave it was paired with. B+/A-.

1988 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
Always one of my favorite Chaves, this one is showing beautifully, but with a bit less fruit than usual with the smoked meat character more prominent leading me to believe the wine might be heading to the back side of peak. Normally there's quite a bit of black fruit to the wine, but in this bottle it's somewhat in the background. Silky upfront with wonderful harmony and softness across the palate, the smokiness of the wine is really quite soothing. Nice and meaty with the usual herb, bacon and lavender character and crisp acidity on the finish. My WOTN. A/A-.

1992 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
When first poured it had an intriguing nose of freshly cut parsley that was quite intense before shifting to a more traditional garrigue character. Resolved, easy drinking and with a loosey-goosey middle, it nonetheless shows a pretty core of sweet red raspberry fruit that has a nice purity to it to go along with black olive notes. Light bodied with not a lot of depth, but quite a success for the vintage. Drink up. B+/A-.

1990 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
Marshall brought a bottle of this for our dinner last year on 1/1/12 and though that was my first wine dinner of the year, that ended up being my wine of the year. That bottle was perhaps the best bottle of it that I've had. It was explosive on the palate, with tremendous fruit, so much complexity and depth and was just belting out opera tunes. The bottle he brought this year, however, from the same case he brought on release, was extremely tight and unyielding. Unfortunately, it was not decanted, which probably would've helped if done earlier in the day. After taking an initial sip, I left mine in the glass untouched for most of the rest of the evening in the hopes that it would open up and it only did just enough to show you that it was chock full of red fruit, meat and spice goodness. Call this showing an A- only because the wine refused to budge. The goods were there, though.

1994 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
Drinking in prime time, though still showing youthfully, there's a lot to like here, from its sweet black fruit, meat and nicoise olive tapenade notes to its black pepper, lavender and garrigue character. It's rich, yet a little chunky with nice acid levels. There's a beautiful floral character to the wine and it just shows a lot of personality and positive energy. A really nice showing. Solid A-.

1998 Domaine Jean-Louis Chave- Hermitage - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
Not as prodigious a showing as a bottle I had last year, but still an excellent showing. This bottle started off with nice fruit levels, but with a bitter chocolate and oak note that was a little too obvious and a body that seemed a little thin. Christine calls out "chocolate covered olives" and yep, I can see that. The wine seemed a touch discombobulated at the onset and, indeed, this wine probably benefited the most from air. By the end of the evening the wine really gained weight, blackberry and black raspberry fruit became more abundant and sweeter, the oak integrated better and meat and violet notes became more apparent. Texturally, the wine showed more heft than it did at the onset. Still quite youthful and relatively primary. Solid A-.

1978 Ch“teau Climens - France, Bordeaux, Sauternais, Barsac
Christine made a remarkable pear tart with pears that had been poached in an oxidized bottle of '83 Climens and this wine was paired with it. Not an auspicious start as the nose was as funky as George Clinton. Musty with vinyl and petrochemical aromas from the get go. Thankfully, those blew off and a more pleasing desiccated pineapple and butterscotch aroma emerged and later took on marzipan notes. On the palate, quite respectable for a weak, low botrytis vintage. There's surprising weight and sweetness here with pleasant pineapple, apricot and butterscotch flavors. That said, it doesn't have the thick texture and intensely honeyed character that a normal botrytis affected vintage has. Finishes with a rum note, but without the burn. Quite nice with the tart. B+/A.

Some pictures from the evening.

The wine lineup.

The group.

Goat cheese and caramelized onion crostada.

Pike quenelles.

Pike quenelle plated.

Daube Provencal.

'83 Climens poached pear tart.

A tasty slice.

Gotta get the shot!

Suzanne, Marshall and Paul.

Kenny, Paul and Sandy.

Diana, Marshall and Suzanne.

Marty handles a mag of Billecart-Salmon Rosé.

Suzanne and Diana do a great job of plating.

Capturing Suzanne capturing the ’78 Climens.
 
The 1988 Chave Hermitage is a great wine, certainly under-rated compared to some of its other similarly aged brothers like the 1990 (although I do have a soft spot in my heart for that one, ever since I guessed it double blind). In general, I think that 1988 was a great vintage in the northern Rhone--not as big as the 1989 and 1990, but ultimately more interesting.

1989 Chapelle was very good, and vastly superior to the over-rated and impenetrable 1990, but still not quite up there with the Chave...
 
originally posted by Carl Steefel:

1989 Chapelle was very good, and vastly superior to the over-rated and impenetrable 1990, but still not quite up there with the Chave...

Can't agree with that at all. I've almost always been underwhelmed by the '89. While there's a bunch of variation with the '90, when it's on like a bottle I had last month, it can be spectacular.
 
originally posted by Carl Steefel:

1989 Chapelle was very good, and vastly superior to the over-rated and impenetrable 1990, but still not quite up there with the Chave...

as a fully paid up member of the "syrah, wtf?" society, i think it worth pointing out that the difference between chave 89 and chapelle 89 is so great that the only reason one would ever think of comparing them is because some points dude said they were compatible. otherwise it's like oranges and turds. or polystyrene and apples. you decide.

and, yes, of course, we have all fallen for that shit, my chubbiness included.

fb.
 
I guess I would say I was underwhelmed by the 1989 Chapelle as well, at least as compared to wines like the '89 Chave, but the two bottles of 1990 Chapelle I had were not impressive at all in my book(one corked and monolithic, the other just monolithic). However, maybe I caught them at the wrong time...
 
I've had the 90 Chapelle (bought because of Parker before I knew better) numbers of times from the bottles I bought and from the cellars of others. I've never seen what the fuss was about it and have always been underwhelmed.

The 89 Chave, however, has aged into something quite beautiful for me. And I bought that because of Parker, too, so you never can tell.
 
originally posted by .sasha:
"Even a broken clock is right twice a day." -VLM

Lewis Carroll said that. Numbers of others as well. I'm reminded of the interchange between Wilde and Whistler.
Wilde: What a charming bon mot. I wish I had said it.
Whistler: You will, Oscar, you will.
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
I've had the 90 Chapelle (bought because of Parker before I knew better) numbers of times from the bottles I bought and from the cellars of others. I've never seen what the fuss was about it and have always been underwhelmed.

The 89 Chave, however, has aged into something quite beautiful for me. And I bought that because of Parker, too, so you never can tell.

I can't recall having the '89, but I did buy the '88 and '91 Chave on the strength of TBPG's endorsements. The '88 was/is quite a phenomenal wine, so I can only imagine what the '89 might be like.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
I've had the 90 Chapelle (bought because of Parker before I knew better) numbers of times from the bottles I bought and from the cellars of others. I've never seen what the fuss was about it and have always been underwhelmed.

The 89 Chave, however, has aged into something quite beautiful for me. And I bought that because of Parker, too, so you never can tell.

I can't recall having the '89, but I did buy the '88 and '91 Chave on the strength of TBPG's endorsements. The '88 was/is quite a phenomenal wine, so I can only imagine what the '89 might be like.

Mark Lipton

I've had the 88 Chave only a couple of times. It too was wonderful. Not better or worse, just different.
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
I've had the 90 Chapelle (bought because of Parker before I knew better) numbers of times from the bottles I bought and from the cellars of others. I've never seen what the fuss was about it and have always been underwhelmed.

The 89 Chave, however, has aged into something quite beautiful for me. And I bought that because of Parker, too, so you never can tell.

I can't recall having the '89, but I did buy the '88 and '91 Chave on the strength of TBPG's endorsements. The '88 was/is quite a phenomenal wine, so I can only imagine what the '89 might be like.

Mark Lipton

I've had the 88 Chave only a couple of times. It too was wonderful. Not better or worse, just different.

I'm kind of in the same boat. I love the '89 Chave as well, but it's a brawnier wine with more red fruit showing and overall a little denser. However, I love the elegance of the '88. Both are gorgeous in my book. The run of '88-'91 at Chave is pretty remarkable.
 
originally posted by Lou Kessler:
Did I hear my name mentioned?
originally posted by SFJoe:
Too bad you didn't invite the Kesslers in hope of an '83.
Duck breast and mole. For that I'll bring an 83 and 85 plus 83 J Aine so we can compare.

I'll do the dishes, Lou!
 
1988 has always been my favorite of 1988-1991 Chaves. All the regular bottlings are wonderful; my mind isn't yet made up about the Cuvée Cathelins. Michel Bettane has told me that he convinced Chave to go 100% new oak and 100% Bessards on the 1990 Caththelin (which is contrary to what I've been told by both Gérard and Jean-Louis Chave who say that the Cathelin is the same wine as the regular with different proportions from the various lieux-dits; I guess if you consider the null set, they all could be correct). Maybe with time what I perceived as a lot of oak in the 1990 Chathelin will wear off/has worn off, but how many people will know it (about 2500 bottles made, and by now, 22 years down the road, I imagine a substantial majority have been drunk)? As for 1989 Chave, it can be lovely, but I've also had an uninspiring bottle from the same batch as the lovely ones and I've also had bad luck with corked bottles from that vintage at Chave.

Jaboulet La Chapelle tastes the way it does to a large extent because most of it comes from the Le Méal leiu-dit which gives a much richer, riper wine. The unassembled Le Méal at Chave has always tasted bigger and fuller than most of the other lieux-dits.

Jaboulet used to make more than one cuvée of La Chapelle (I think they don't any more under the new regime, but I've not been there in some time), so you're not always comparing apples to apples just because the labels are the same. I've experienced one amazing bottle of 1990 La Chapelle and a whole bunch that left me unimpressed and nonplussed. But that's not unusual for old Rhônes -- I've never had an impressive bottle of 1978 Chave (cf., Livingstone-Learmonth's comments on the two 1978 Chaves).
 
Claude -

With respect to Cathelin, are you referring to 100% new oak during the first year in barrique or during the entire time prior to bottling?

Multiple 78s are beyond any doubt based on my experience. But then again, I don't think there was a consistent single bottling until Cathelin was introduced. Other than 78, the two vintages in which I've gathered plenty of anecdotal evidence supporting the multiple bottling theory were 85 and 88.
 
Back
Top