Yeast for thought

Yes, Oswaldo, the "rhetoric" is in the way a bit.

I would really have liked to have known, for instance, whether we could have our roses and eat them too? That is, can we have strains that produce yummy flavors and few bad ones, or do we have to take our good with our bad?

Or, do we have to make a mutual cultural agreement on what tastes good and what doesn't (this negotiation goes on here a lot of the time). 4-EP doesn't remind me so much of five-spice flavors, but hey, I had an andouillette for lunch yesterday so who am I to nitpick cultural norms?
 
Good article, and very interesting to see that this research is being done at UC Davis.
The flavors spit out by yeasts during fermentation play a huge role in the final taste, and generally are under appreciated. Not by the group here, but over all I would say.

Orval to me is the classic beer where brett plays a big role in the flavor. One of my favorites.
Although maybe not as good today as it used to be.

Thanks, Oswaldo.
 
originally posted by Marc D:

Orval to me is the classic beer where brett plays a big role in the flavor. One of my favorites.
Although maybe not as good today as it used to be.

For me, that crown goes to Cantillon, and I'm also fond of Hanssens.

They're all chock full of Pediococcus damnosus, too. My impression is that Hanssens has more brett and less pedio in the mix than Orval or Cantillon.
 
Ken, I presume that you're not doing microbial inventory of your beers, so what favors are indicative to you of pedio? Are they distinct from those of lactobacillus? Bretty flavors I'm good with already.

Just learning my microbiota,
Mark Lipton
 
Orval is great but perhaps it has become a bit "easy" in recent years. But there's still a good dose of brett in there - as there is in traditional Lambic. De Cam and Cantillon are the best I've so far had.
 
Pedio damnosus is similar to a lactobacillus (I know these species get reclassified occasionally), and it produces sharp lactic acid flavors that are more pronounced on the palate than the "horse blanket" character of brett. Pedio cervisiae supposedly produces less diacetyl than Pedio damnosus. Obviously there are lots of different Brett characteristics (I'm fond of lambics that present like an empty barn loft on a humid, late fall day), but I have always thought Brett expresses itself in a way that is a combination of aromatic impacts with complex flavor components. Pedio is just cranky on the tongue, in a curmudgeonly (and potentially buttery) sort of way. Or more colloquially, Brett is like Coad or the Professor with attitudes, and Pedio is more like fb or Dressner (was).

I just grabbed an Orval to make sure that I was not speaking strictly from palate memory that might be inaccurate. I went through a case that I bought at the monastery in '95. I still think that while there is Brett in there, the prominent characteristic is a defined lactic bite that blends with the hops to produce the spank on the finish. The acidity does seem less pronounced than it was then, and the beer also seems maltier and a few degrees darker.
 
originally posted by Marc D:
originally posted by Keith M:
Interesting . . .

Enjoyed reading that, thanks.
I think the author did a great job.
Accurate and enlightening.

The piece on the C hops was good too.
"If your beer smells like you are at a Phish concert, that's Columbus"

One of my good friends is Dr. Dan McConnell. He ran YeastLab in the 90's. He made "brew naked" pale ales, in which two-row pale malt (only) was infusion mashed and hopped with a single hop variety, and fermented with a yeast starter grown up from a slant. It was a great way to get a handle on a yeast strain's fermentation kinetics and finished beer flavor profile. One variable in each category, nothing to hide behind. Great learning vehicles, those. If you plated them out, they also revealed a lot about your sanitation skills. We'd use Cascades for American styles, or East Kent Goldings for British ales. I still find a well made naked pale to be one of my favorite beers.
 
originally posted by Ken Schramm:
originally posted by Marc D:
originally posted by Keith M:
Interesting . . .

Enjoyed reading that, thanks.
I think the author did a great job.
Accurate and enlightening.

The piece on the C hops was good too.
"If your beer smells like you are at a Phish concert, that's Columbus"

One of my good friends is Dr. Dan McConnell. He ran YeastLab in the 90's. He made "brew naked" pale ales, in which two-row pale malt (only) was infusion mashed and hopped with a single hop variety, and fermented with a yeast starter grown up from a slant. It was a great way to get a handle on a yeast strain's fermentation kinetics and finished beer flavor profile. One variable in each category, nothing to hide behind. Great learning vehicles, those. If you plated them out, they also revealed a lot about your sanitation skills. We'd use Cascades for American styles, or East Kent Goldings for British ales. I still find a well made naked pale to be one of my favorite beers.

That would be interesting to try, but instead use the same yeast and make the variable the fermentation temperature.

Does Orval still dry hop their beer?
 
originally posted by Otto Nieminen:
Does Orval still dry hop their beer?

Have they ever? I just asked the Finnish importer and he was pretty certain they never have.
I remember reading that they did dry hop, just as they add yeast after the fermentation is done and before bottling. From Stan Hieronymus' book Brew Like a Monk. The book was published in 2005 and maybe things have changed.
 
I didn't recall the dry hopping in Orval. I checked Michael Jackson's "The Great Beers of Belgium" (1991) and "The Classic Beers of Belgium" by Christian Deglas and Guy Derdelinckx. Jackson's description of the beer and processes is much more complete. German and English hops are employed. He confirms that there is a dry hopping, rare among Belgians, and even rarer among Trappists. He also mentions that Kent Goldings are in there.

Jackson reports that there is a single cell strain on the first stage of the fermentation, and that the second pitch contains "a symbiosis of four or five cultures" plus priming sugar before bottling. There is a two month conditioning at the brewery. Jackson: "This triple fermentation no doubt contributes to both the acidity and the complexity of Orval." The secular brewer, Roger Schoonjans, stated that he prefers his at about a year. The beer gets "drier and more acidic" when given that much conditioning, which leads me to believe that something more than Brett is afoot here. Brett dries, but does not produce acidity like Pedios or Lactos. Also interesting is that Schoonjans commented that their customers expect variation in the beer: "People do not want our beer to taste exactly the same every time. They want the gout d'Orval, for sure, but they want to be able to chat about it: 'I think this one one is a little more hoppy... yesterday's was rounder...' In that respect, they treat it like wine."

Very apropos of this discussion.

Damn, I miss Michael Jackson.

When I was there, I had a discussion with the one monk who was at the retail sales bench (the only one who gets to speak). He was pissed because the EU had required them to put a "best before" date on the bottles. They had stretched it to five years, but he still thought that was BS. "We have bottles in the cellar that are 20 years old, and they are delicious." I wanted one. I settled for a kilo of the Trappist cheese, which was excellent. We went across the lawn for an omelette at the restaurant.

KDS

BTW, Hieronymus was a technical editor for my book.
 
From the entry for "Orval Brewery" in the 2012 Oxford Companion to Beer:

". . . a unique taste profile due mainly to the yeast strains used, the dry-hopping with fresh Hallertau, Styrian Golding, and French Strisselspalt hops."

The entry also mentions that brett is a component in the yeast cocktail used to bottle-condition the beers.

Entry written by Keith Villa, who, I just discovered, is the creator of Blue Moon. Interesting.
 
Creator seems like puffery for what is essentially a version of a Belgian white. While Pierre Celis didn't create the category, he did revive Hoegaarden from obscurity. I suspect that Villa's creation is the establishment of Coor's as a craft brewer.
 
Back
Top