Travels with DJ Steve Part 3, Cabernet Franc

originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Yixin:
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Mark Davis:
Are the Guillot vines a lot younger?
Yes.

Without being strict about a hierarchy, the Clos Guillot certainly is more structured. I confess to a sentimental fondness for the Grézeaux. But they do pour it before the Guillot. You can take that as an implied comment about structure or about quality as you like.

Structure more than quality. Latter depends on the vintage; gravel-rooted vines behave oddly.
The VLM's multivariate model disagrees, I think. But I buy more Grézeaux.

Funny thing is, Matthieu doesn't understand why we like the Grézeaux so much. He feels it is vastly inferior to Guillot. I find a lot of comfort in Grézeaux, like an old sweater.
 
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:

And I learned the really good stuff takes about 50 years to come around. So it goes.

Really? By age 50 it's more likely to be generic old wine, or generic old franc at best.
 
originally posted by VLM:

Funny thing is, Matthieu doesn't understand why we like the Grézeaux so much. He feels it is vastly inferior to Guillot. I find a lot of comfort in Grézeaux, like an old sweater.
That is funny. I can imagine in 20 years, with older vines, the case will be stronger. But for now, I quite agree with you. I like that taste.

Oh, and fuck hierarchies.
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:

And I learned the really good stuff takes about 50 years to come around. So it goes.

Really? By age 50 it's more likely to be generic old wine, or generic old franc at best.
I spent an hour and a half with a glass of '64 that says differently.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by VLM:

Funny thing is, Matthieu doesn't understand why we like the Grézeaux so much. He feels it is vastly inferior to Guillot. I find a lot of comfort in Grézeaux, like an old sweater.
That is funny. I can imagine in 20 years, with older vines, the case will be stronger. But for now, I quite agree with you. I like that taste.

Oh, and fuck hierarchies.

Ditto here. Not that I drink as much of them as either of you but there are very few wines I enjoy as much or as reliably as a Baudry Grezeaux.
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by SFJoe:
I don't have 50 years, I fear.

1995 Baudry Croix Boissee (not labeled that way) is a funny wine, sometimes just totally closed. I don't understand it.

Mine are gone. 1997 too.
I would open one, find it closed, and wait.

Rinse, repeat.

I guess I'll just drink up.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by SFJoe:
I don't have 50 years, I fear.

1995 Baudry Croix Boissee (not labeled that way) is a funny wine, sometimes just totally closed. I don't understand it.

Mine are gone. 1997 too.
I would open one, find it closed, and wait.

Rinse, repeat.

I guess I'll just drink up.

I've had glorious bottles, closed bottles, and even OTH seeming bottles, but none in a couple of years.
 
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:

And I learned the really good stuff takes about 50 years to come around. So it goes.

Really? By age 50 it's more likely to be generic old wine, or generic old franc at best.
I spent an hour and a half with a glass of '64 that says differently.

I have no doubt that you had a great experience at the cave with a wine that has never been moved, but I think that is the exception. All wines tend towards an asymptotic point where they lose the individuality that we cherish.

Would you seriously recommend waiting 25 years to drink Lenoir?
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by VLM:

Funny thing is, Matthieu doesn't understand why we like the Grézeaux so much. He feels it is vastly inferior to Guillot. I find a lot of comfort in Grézeaux, like an old sweater.
That is funny. I can imagine in 20 years, with older vines, the case will be stronger. But for now, I quite agree with you. I like that taste.

Oh, and fuck hierarchies.

You can't agree with me in one sentence then write "fuck hierarchies" in the next... [G]
 
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by VLM:

Funny thing is, Matthieu doesn't understand why we like the Grézeaux so much. He feels it is vastly inferior to Guillot. I find a lot of comfort in Grézeaux, like an old sweater.
That is funny. I can imagine in 20 years, with older vines, the case will be stronger. But for now, I quite agree with you. I like that taste.

Oh, and fuck hierarchies.

Ditto here. Not that I drink as much of them as either of you but there are very few wines I enjoy as much or as reliably as a Baudry Grezeaux.

I haven't been drinking much cabernet franc in recent years but I used to like Grézeaux the most of the Baudry wines because of the distinctive taste and perhaps because I started drinking it before the CB. So for a while, I would often prefer Grézeaux to CB for sentimental reasons, even though I could see why the latter was more impressive.

Such is wine.
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:

And I learned the really good stuff takes about 50 years to come around. So it goes.

Really? By age 50 it's more likely to be generic old wine, or generic old franc at best.
I spent an hour and a half with a glass of '64 that says differently.

I have no doubt that you had a great experience at the cave with a wine that has never been moved, but I think that is the exception. All wines tend towards an asymptotic point where they lose the individuality that we cherish.

Would you seriously recommend waiting 25 years to drink Lenoir?
No, but it's something special. 15 years is where it starts to get really interesting, for the good bottles.
 
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:

And I learned the really good stuff takes about 50 years to come around. So it goes.

Really? By age 50 it's more likely to be generic old wine, or generic old franc at best.
I spent an hour and a half with a glass of '64 that says differently.

I have no doubt that you had a great experience at the cave with a wine that has never been moved, but I think that is the exception. All wines tend towards an asymptotic point where they lose the individuality that we cherish.

Would you seriously recommend waiting 25 years to drink Lenoir?
No, but it's something special. 15 years is where it starts to get really interesting, for the good bottles.
Opened an 04 last night which is not in a particularly happy place right now IMO. Was closed down pretty hard.
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Would it be wasteful to open a 2007 Croix Boisée soon?

No. It is a good idea.

shows tonight like a playful, face licking, puppy dog. good call.

fb.
 
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by VLM:

Funny thing is, Matthieu doesn't understand why we like the Grézeaux so much. He feels it is vastly inferior to Guillot. I find a lot of comfort in Grézeaux, like an old sweater.
That is funny. I can imagine in 20 years, with older vines, the case will be stronger. But for now, I quite agree with you. I like that taste.

Oh, and fuck hierarchies.

Ditto here. Not that I drink as much of them as either of you but there are very few wines I enjoy as much or as reliably as a Baudry Grezeaux.

Me too, but, skinflint that I am, I don't spring for the more spendy cuvees very often.

Mark Lipton
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Cory Cartwright:

And I learned the really good stuff takes about 50 years to come around. So it goes.

Really? By age 50 it's more likely to be generic old wine, or generic old franc at best.
I spent an hour and a half with a glass of '64 that says differently.

I have no doubt that you had a great experience at the cave with a wine that has never been moved, but I think that is the exception. All wines tend towards an asymptotic point where they lose the individuality that we cherish.

He did say, "the really good stuff", So given that, and setting aside the exception aspect, couldn't it also be said that those cherished particulars eventually give way to something less specific but delicious simply as Wine. I sure do cherish those when they come along. Then it's just a sensuous vinous delight and the details no longer matter so much.

Would you seriously recommend waiting 25 years to drink Lenoir?

Having been fortunate enough to visit twice, courtesy of Guilhaume (and Cory), and try a whole bunch of vintages back to '67, I'd offer that, purely speaking in terms of whether that age would bring benefits not manifested sooner, I'd say yes, mostly. Luckily, one only need only wait 15-18 years due to the long élevage and late release. Not quite as serious.
 
Back
Top