originally posted by MLipton:
originally posted by Mark Davis:
Mark:
It's all relative.
I spent about 26 years in SE Michigan. To me, Oregon is worlds more beautiful in both arboreal splendor and lake, strike that, ocean-shore...I did travel to the UP several times as well and it was OK.
I do really miss Zingerman's though - world class Deli IMHO. I miss the sports and agree that it is debatable.
People know how to drive there as well.
It is indeed all relative, Mark, but I see it from the mirror image perspective, having grown up on the West Coast and spent copious amounts of time in Northern California and Oregon. I'm not disputing your comparison, but saying rather that -- for this part of the country -- what Michigan offers is hard to find elsewhere. The Smokies are beautiful in their own right, but they are deciduous hardwood forest. For an evergreen forest, Michigan is the best option, the SE region notwithstanding. YMMV, as it must.
Michigan drivers, OTOH, get no props from me. I can always tell when a Michigan driver is behind me because they tailgate no matter what the speed, whatever the circumstances. Michigan drivers are marginally less aggressive than Illinois drivers (who are almost uniformly complete assholes on the road) and less clueless than Ohio and Indiana drivers, though that's a pretty low bar. Of course, what trumps even location is vehicle: pickups are the most aggressive, followed closely by SUVs. I attribute those characteristics to an artificial feeling of invulnerability instilled by the size of the vehicle. Or it could just be testosterone poisoning at work.
Mark Lipton