Claude Kolm
Claude Kolm
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Having reviewed Coates's and Norman's books, I realize description of stem-destem protocol is a standard element of domaine descriptions. I'm surprised to learn that, say, Bize and Pavelot in Savigny both include some stems, because the style of the wines from these two vinters seem fairly distinct.
Where did you get that Pavelot includes stems (or did you mean to say Chandon-de-Briailles)? Hugues always tells me that he destems completely and Jasper Morris and Coates both report the same.
I read it in Norman and Taylor, 2010 (p. 135); however, it's just a small percentage and only in 'ripe, healthy' years, excluding, for example, 2006-2008. I'd overlooked this qualification when I wrote the previous post; it fits in with your information, as well as my own (highly inexpert) sense that these wines are not 'stemmy.'
My notes don't indicate that I asked him about 2005. Many people who ordinarily don't use stems did use some in 2005 and 2009. Looking at my notes for 2009, they indicate that I did ask Hugues and he said that the quality wasn't there to use them -- implying that he would have liked to have done so had he judged it possible.
His attitude is representative of a change that is taking place now in Burgundy. Many (but not all) producers who were dead set against use of stems some years ago are now more open to experimenting with them in certain vintages (and still others say that they would like to, but regard the process as too risky/difficult). It represents a big swing back from the 1980s and early 1990s when the great majority of producers abandoned use of stems. Henri Jayer had a big influence on them, and I think the lycée viticole must have begun teaching not to use stems around then, as I believe it still does today. Maybe Brézème can add some more insight.