TN: A night of Bordeaux as Tom Reddick pays a return visit to NYC.

Brad Kane

Brad Kane
Tom Reddick was back in town last Thursday and rather than the usual Burgundy and Champagne theme, which I am happily excluded from, Suzanne Camhi organized a Bordeaux theme, so I was in like Flynn. Bill Lawrence, Jay Miller, Chris Kravitz, Paul Jaouen and Perry Shusterman rounded out the guest list and we settled in at Le Philosophe for a fun evening filled with tasty treats.

2008 François Chidaine- Vouvray Le Bouchet - France, Loire Valley, Touraine, Vouvray
Suzanne was a sweetheart for bringing this wine as it's one of my favorites from '08. This one took a little while to get going, initially showing surprisingly soft acid structure. With air, however, it picked up and was its usual vivacious and enthralling self. Still youthful with quince, apple, chalky mineral and acacia. Moderately sweet, but balanced perfectly. There's just so much thrill factor and personality to this wine. It paired wonderfully with the frog leg, maitake and sunchoke appetizer. A/A-.

2006 Francis Boulard- Champagne Les Rachais - France, Champagne, Montagne de Reims, Champagne
Lean in style with a bit more mousse than I prefer. Mineral driven with a touch of brioche and not much fruit other than some tart apple and citrus. High acid and showing lots of finesse, but it could use more fruit. B/B+.

1995 Chateau Gruaud Larose - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Julien
Post Cordier, so much of the funk is gone. It's quite beguiling on the nose, actually, with cherry, game, earth and tobacco showing. It just really says "Bordeaux." On the palate, it's quite pleasant, but doesn't quite live up to the nose. It's drinking well for a '95, showing a softness I haven't seen in too many others from the vintage, though there is some austerity to the wine on the finish. Mid-weight with a nice mix of cherry, herb, tobacco and earth flavors. There's some oak that still needs to integrate and the acids and drying tannins need some food to smooth them out. Solid B+.

1981 Chateau La Mission Haut-Brion - France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Showing beautifully with less brett than a bottle last year and much more of a Graves earth presence. Aromatically it's singing with earth, red and black fruit, worn leather, herb, tobacco and rust. There's some leanness on the palate, but it serves to streamline the wine as there's a lovely silkiness that makes for an engaging mouthfeel. Similar flavors as aromas with the fruit still showing some sweetness. Drinking nicely and showing plenty of personality, though certainly on the back side of peak. A-

1982 Domaine de Chevalier - France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Controversial only in determining what was wrong with it, with the group split between it being obliterated by brett, or being corked. I never got any tca on the nose, or in the mouth, but got plenty of Brett. However, going back to the wine later in the evening, what fruit was there at the onset had left and the wine had a tell tale clipped finish that tells me there was indeed some tca around. NR (flawed)

1985 Chateau Pichon Longueville Comtesse de Lalande - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Pauillac
A Labrador retriever of a wine as it's just so friendly and welcoming, which is how I view the '85 vintage as a whole. It's fully integrated and has a wonderful softness and elegance about it that put a smile on everyone's face. There's plenty of sweetness to the black fruit, terrific earthiness with a bit of tobacco and herb. At peak, but no rush. My second favorite wine of the night. Solid A-.

1985 Chateau Cos d'Estournel - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe
A little more subdued than the last bottle I had, but a pleasant showing nonetheless. Plenty of tobacco to be had with sweet black cherry fruit, cocoa and spice. There's a softness to the acidity and the oak is apparent, which takes away some vibrancy and focus, but it's tasty. A-/B+.

1985 Chateau La Mission Haut-Brion - France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Sadly, it appears as if this bottle has seen some poor storage along the way as it's not showing as it should and there's some discernible maderization on the nose and palate. NR.

1989 Chateau Margaux - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
A few people were stunned by how ordinary this wine showed, but, truth be told, this was viewed as a relative dog on release given the pedigree and the vintage. But, Margaux was not alone in '89 as Haut Brion was the only first growth that truly excelled that vintage. The wine shows plummy red fruit, the greenness the wine showed in its youth seems to have shifted into a much more pleasurable tobacco realm and there's nice earthiness, but there's not much mid-palate depth and there's some drying and fragility on the finish. Perfectly fine, but given the producer and the vintage, one expects much more, especially when one factors in pricing. B+.

1989 Chateau Palmer - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, Margaux
When this wine is on it's a sexy beast of wine and is in the handful of wines I consider my favorite from the vintage as it shows wonderful finesse as well as power. Unfortunately, I'm probably running 50/50 between excellent showings and disappointing ones and this bottle is subdued. It's muted on the nose and on the palate. No sign of tca, but the wine is reticent. It shows some red and black fruit, cedar and mineral, but it's tough to stay focused on it when you know what the wine can be. A-/B+.

1990 Chateau La Conseillante - France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
Last wine of the night and the wine of the night. It's a full throttle, peacock of wine that is out there flamboyantly strutting its stuff. Intensely aromatic and showing plenty of ripe black plums, black currants, black raspberry and black cherry fruit with floral notes, coffee and mineral on both the nose and palate. There's some toasty oak that still needs to integrate a bit further, but the wine is nicely balanced. Really long and pleasurable in the mouth and just a joy to drink. A.

The lineup.
Bordeaux_lineup_Tom_Reddick_dinner_6-20-13.jpg
 
originally posted by Brad Kane:
TN: A night of Bordeaux as Tom Reddick pays a return visit to NYC.Tom Reddick was back in town last Thursday and rather than the usual Burgundy and Champagne theme, which I am happily excluded from, Suzanne Camhi organized a Bordeaux theme, so I was in like Flynn. Bill Lawrence, Chris Kravitz, Paul Jaouen and Perry Shusterman rounded out the guest list and we settled in at Le Philosophe for a fun evening filled with tasty treats.

I'm invisible!

The DDC was definitely corked.
 
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
TN: A night of Bordeaux as Tom Reddick pays a return visit to NYC.Tom Reddick was back in town last Thursday and rather than the usual Burgundy and Champagne theme, which I am happily excluded from, Suzanne Camhi organized a Bordeaux theme, so I was in like Flynn. Bill Lawrence, Chris Kravitz, Paul Jaouen and Perry Shusterman rounded out the guest list and we settled in at Le Philosophe for a fun evening filled with tasty treats.

I'm invisible!

Oy and you were directly in front of me! You shouldn't be so loud next time.
 
I agree about the beauty of the 1990 Chateau La Conseillante but I thought the 1985 LMHB matched it for about the first 2-3 minutes in the glass after which it declined rapidly.

I think you were too generous with the 1989 Margaux. A perfectly pleasant $15-$20 vin ordinaire.
 
This is like a trip back to Memory Lane! The 81 La Miss was sadly the only one I've had of this, but it was a beautiful bottle (like many other 81's I've had the pleasure of drinking), 85 PLL...yumms! I love the '80 Pichon Lalande style. And I would love to 'Bring back da Funk' for Cordier. Time travel to Soul Train!
 
That is a wine that ended up with some kind of serious chemical problems. I think I still might have a bottle or two left, all were bad. Just pour a little anywhere on your body and you're safe from vampires for all eternity. I don't know what happened to that wine but it was pretty much that way with everybody I've known that might have tasted it.
 
originally posted by Lou Kessler:
82 ChevalierThat is a wine that ended up with some kind of serious chemical problems. I think I still might have a bottle or two left, all were bad. Just pour a little anywhere on your body and you're safe from vampires for all eternity. I don't know what happened to that wine but it was pretty much that way with everybody I've known that might have tasted it.

I don't know if the 1982 was abused as badly as the 1983 was (by several importers, mind you) in this country, but not being 100% clean to begin with, it could stand no abuse.

But marvelous bottles of this exist, and it might have been Jay Miller who opened a wonderful example over the past year or two ( unless it was VL ).
 
originally posted by Brad Kane:
But, Margaux was not alone in '89 as Haut Brion was the only first growth that truly excelled that vintage.

we obviously read different books.

actually, I don't read.
 
originally posted by .sasha:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
But, Margaux was not alone in '89 as Haut Brion was the only first growth that truly excelled that vintage.

we obviously read different books.

actually, I don't read.

And we obviously have different assessments of what we've tasted. You can say with a straight face that Margaux, Latour, Lafite and Mouton lived up to the vintage? There are quite a number of other producers that made far more compelling wines than they did.
 
originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by .sasha:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
But, Margaux was not alone in '89 as Haut Brion was the only first growth that truly excelled that vintage.

we obviously read different books.

actually, I don't read.

And we obviously have different assessments of what we've tasted. You can say with a straight face that Margaux, Latour, Lafite and Mouton lived up to the vintage? There are quite a number of other producers that made far more compelling wines than they did.

as long as it is truly *your* opinion, I am all ears.
 
originally posted by .sasha:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by .sasha:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
But, Margaux was not alone in '89 as Haut Brion was the only first growth that truly excelled that vintage.

we obviously read different books.

actually, I don't read.

And we obviously have different assessments of what we've tasted. You can say with a straight face that Margaux, Latour, Lafite and Mouton lived up to the vintage? There are quite a number of other producers that made far more compelling wines than they did.

as long as it is truly *your* opinion, I am all ears.

Really, Sasha? That's beneath you.
 
originally posted by .sasha:
originally posted by Lou Kessler:
82 ChevalierThat is a wine that ended up with some kind of serious chemical problems. I think I still might have a bottle or two left, all were bad. Just pour a little anywhere on your body and you're safe from vampires for all eternity. I don't know what happened to that wine but it was pretty much that way with everybody I've known that might have tasted it.

I don't know if the 1982 was abused as badly as the 1983 was (by several importers, mind you) in this country, but not being 100% clean to begin with, it could stand no abuse.

But marvelous bottles of this exist, and it might have been Jay Miller who opened a wonderful example over the past year or two ( unless it was VL ).

That was me. It led me to source 2 more bottles, one of which was very good though not as good as the first and one of which was this.
 
I have to agree with Brad, here, except for Mouton, which performed at its typical underperforming level. I've found the '90's of Latour, Lafite, and Margaux to be much better than the '89s, and among the wines of the vintage. The only '89 First Growth I would put among the best wines of the vintage is HB.
 
If I'm not mistaken, that cuvee is an extra-brut and bottled with about 2 grams dosage. How much fruit were you expecting? I am not afraid dosage, but I don't go looking for a ton of richness or fruit in an extra-brut Champagne. Especially one that young.
 
Back
Top