Hi! Lots of thoughts to deal with there both interesting and uninteresting so let's take them one by one.
- I am genuinely pleased that you find my general thoughts on wine interesting! I have always figured that if I were ever to have any audience at all, it would be among the curmudgeonly and the misanthropic, regardless of girth.
- You must go to some considerable effort to ignore my specific tasting notes since I don't post them here! Nevertheless I am not at all offended you find them uninteresting. ALL tasting notes are uninteresting; their only purpose is (sometimes) to prompt some interesting conversation, which actually does sometimes happen. The only interesting specific tasting note that I can even think of is Allen Meadows' 100-point tasting note on Rudy's bottle of 1945 Romanée-Conti, which is only interesting on account of trying to figure out what the blending components might have been.
- I don't have any religion nor any limits dictated thereby, just an unpleasant reality that the cumulative cost of the various stuff I want exceeds my income, so some rationing is in order.
- I will take the 0.25/3 rating on "funny" as an unfortunate symptom of grade inflation in the modern academy since I wasn't trying to be funny at all. But if we're grading funny, I give a 0 out of 3 to this recurring "teh" bit which wasn't even funny the first time around. I hereby unilaterally retire this non-joke.
- I don't even know what herd I'm bonding with but I feel like such a manly man! Grrr! Pass me some cigarettes and Bounty paper towels to go with my natural wine!
- Spelling only 0.3/3? Now THAT hurts. What'd I spell wrong?
- Once AGAIN that 0.05/3 on the "interesting insight" criterion is naked grade inflation. The whole point of this post was to be uninteresting. I demand to know where that 0.05 came from.