Last Night at Fung Tu ....

kirk wallace

kirk wallace
Gene Vilensky had the great idea of getting some Wachau wine lovers together to pair wines from great producers and great sites in a recent vintage and one or more older vintages. And thanks to some very generous digging in people's cellars and Gene's mathematical and geometry-inclined mind, we ended up with the following pairs:

Prager Bodenstein Riesling: 01 & 11
The '01 is a consistent favorite and this bottle was no exception. Stunning balance and precision; fragrant and light on its feet, with great length and persistence.
The '11 was seeringly acidic at first, but after 30 minutes, it softened a touch. there was a recognizable similarity between these two wines.

Alzinger Loibenerbg Riesling: 90, 97, 12
The '90 was a bit oxidized; hard to enjoy given its company.
The '97 was stunning; beautiful in all respects. amazing density of flavor but, as is typical for Alzinger, totally light in the mouth. Many votes for WOTN.
The '12 was excellent, until later that evening, I would say i have never had a young wine from a Wachau producer that was this compelling and drinkable. It was delicious from moment 1 and improved over the course of the evening.

FXP Kellerberg Riesling 93 , 95, 11
The '11 was almost undrinkable for me: all acidity and extract; dense and unyielding. a great wine in 10 years, i suspect.
the '95 was very good but a bit heavy; probably some botrytis. i didn't spend much time with this wine because:
The '93 was amazing; complete in all respects and deeply satisfying and happy-making. At the moment, i can't recall having had a better FXP Kellerberg.

Alzinger Steinertal GV: 99 , 11
the '99 was good but seemed a bit over-ripe; of course still relatively precise, in the Alzinger style.
the '11 was utterly arresting; i was shocked that a Wachau wine at this age could be this complex and this delicious. This and '12 Loibenberg will have to make me re-think my drinking patterns, at least with Alzinger.

Hirtzberger Honivogl GV: 71, 97, 11 & FXP GV “M” 94

The '71 unfortunately had been affected by mold sneaking down the edge of the bottle by a slightly shrunken cork; it was not undrinkable, but very hard to get past the mold taint.
the '97 made up for it; great GV flavor; stood up to some spicy dumpling knots with ground pork. a beautiful wine that doesn't seem at any risk of fading.

The '11 shows great promise but was too young and tight for me (and i was slowing down, given the 9 wines that preceded it .

The '94 FXP GV "M" was gorgeous; not hot or heavy at all, as some modern M's have been. Unfortunately my only bottle. If you see this available (from a good cellar), I'd say grab it.

And with that, we let the restaurant staff go home.
 
Thanks for the notes! It killed me to miss this! Strong showing for the Alzingers. I have had some outstanding 95 Pichler Kellerbergs.
 
I should add that the food was great, and that everyone at Fung Tu is a big fan of Kirk's. I need to get back there more than I do. And by the by, Jason is doing a very interesting list to go with the tasty chow.

I am in the funny position of pretty much agreeing with Kirk's take on the wines. I wish I could muster some antagonism, but I just don't have it in me today.
 
This mold-down-the-shrunken cork thing seems to be peculiar to Austrian wines. I don't recall having seen it anywhere else.

Any guesses why it happens?
 
Notice how many times Kirk uses the word balance in his report.

But this is just fine, since all sorts of other fancy accolades are reserved for non-2001 Bodenstein wines.

This is why Kirk is Kirk, and we are not.

:-)
 
originally posted by SFJoe:
This mold-down-the-shrunken cork thing seems to be peculiar to Austrian wines. I don't recall having seen it anywhere else.

Any guesses why it happens?

Perhaps because of the rare combination of wine capable of aging for 40+ years but where producers couldn't afford decent corks? Maybe the future Disorderlies will find the '01's and '2012s not to have this problem in in 2054.
 
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:

What are we?

devo.gif
 
originally posted by kirk wallace:


Perhaps because of the rare combination of wine capable of aging for 40+ years but where producers couldn't afford decent corks?

That is an interesting hypothesis.

I suppose it is true of postwar Barolo, too.
 
A handful maybe pre-Vietnam war. But I have been blanked on pre-'59 Barolo. I have generous friends, but I guess there is a limit.
 
Back
Top