Death of the Winemaker

As for Rolland = Kincade, disliking what Rolland does is no reason to equiparate him with the lowest boundary of painting. Rolland is at the top of his field, the king of interventionists, closest of any flying winemaker to the golden touch genius model personified by Picasso.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
A hypothetical stab at an answer: the soil should be as alive as it can be, the ungrafted vine as treatment-free as it can be, the pruning guided by nature-dependent (e.g., lunar) criteria, the picking done when sugar stops accumulating as a result of photosynthesis and starts accumulating as a result of evaporation (if the tannins are still green at that point, that’s just tough), the ambient yeast fermentation should last only as long as it takes to fully ferment the sugar, the ageing should be in neutral containers using nature-dependent criteria (no idea what this would mean here), the bottling should be without fining, filtering or SO2. You would have to keep your fingers amazingly crossed, hoping that it would taste good, and last a few years. If it's stable, perhaps it will speak of its place and grape more clearly than wines made any other way. Assuming that's the grail. If it tastes shitty, you can at least be proud of your principles, and your banter would make you a hit at contemporary art openings.
It seems to me that others must have tried something like this already; your through-line seems clear enough. Given the amount of work and the amount of luck involved I think this is more art than commerce: a blessed event when it works but, well, how much paper did Picasso go through on a given project (sketches, practice, etc.)?

The vigneron needs to do something to keep body and soul together. Thus do I advocate a stance with slightly compromised but practical principles. I suppose we drink wines like this a good deal.
 
Back
Top