Jay Miller
Jay Miller
originally posted by Tom Blach:
For some reason 2004 is a great vintage for Bourgogne rouge, much better than 05.
Not the Leroy. Greenie green green green
originally posted by Tom Blach:
For some reason 2004 is a great vintage for Bourgogne rouge, much better than 05.
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by Tom Blach:
For some reason 2004 is a great vintage for Bourgogne rouge, much better than 05.
Not the Leroy. Greenie green green green
originally posted by kirk wallace:
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by Tom Blach:
For some reason 2004 is a great vintage for Bourgogne rouge, much better than 05.
Not the Leroy. Greenie green green green
Not the last 2 bottles i've had. Turned gorgeous.
I find it's a hit or miss category. Some are open, some are not, can't really find a unifying thread.originally posted by BJ:
I think it's too early for 05's, including weightier Bourgognes.
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
originally posted by kirk wallace:
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by Tom Blach:
For some reason 2004 is a great vintage for Bourgogne rouge, much better than 05.
Not the Leroy. Greenie green green green
Not the last 2 bottles i've had. Turned gorgeous.
Seconded. My last, some two years ago, was fantastic.
originally posted by Ken Schramm:
Ditto on the '05 Lafarge. It's like the stuff is pissed off that I bought it.