Jeebus in Wash DC, 8/24

We have a reservation for 8 people at dino at 7 (i think). Seating time i mean. Well i am happy to come up with a theme - how about "wines Maureen really likes"?
 
What about a theme the out-of-town guest likes? What am I, chopped liver?
(Actually, Maureen's theme is just fine, based on her tasting notes on this bored.)
 
originally posted by maureen:
We have a reservation for 8 people at dino at 7 (i think). Seating time i mean. Well i am happy to come up with a theme - how about "wines Maureen really likes"?
Click to expand...

There are worse things than dinner with only Burgundy and Riesling I suppose.
 
I like traditional barolo, huet, old rioja - not a fan of rhone wine with the exception of about everything of eric's that i've had.

Also like vatan clos neore, aged chenin, austrian riesling. The list goes on!
 
originally posted by maureen:
I like traditional barolo, huet, old rioja - not a fan of rhone wine with the exception of about everything of eric's that i've had.

Also like vatan clos neore, aged chenin, austrian riesling. The list goes on!
Click to expand...

Wow, you've come around! I remember you refusing to even try a 1995 CVNE that I brought to DC many years ago.
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
By the law of non-contradiction, truth is unitary: a proposition is either accurate or not, true or not. If a question has more than one possible true answer, then one can never know what the true answer is. There might as well be an infinite number of true answers. Usually, there is some wiggle room for two possible answers, though. More than two is simply unacceptable, though. Hence the mode of counting is one, more than one, infinity.
Click to expand...

For all philosophers?
 
Is Dino closer to the U St or Shaw Howard station? Their website says it's close to both. I'll be coming from the Woodley Park station.
 
Well it is almost exactly between the two. I would get off at the U st station and walk 3.5 blocks east on U to 9th then take a right and it is about half a block down. Gets you off train sooner and U st is hoppin'
 
originally posted by Cliff:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
By the law of non-contradiction, truth is unitary: a proposition is either accurate or not, true or not. If a question has more than one possible true answer, then one can never know what the true answer is. There might as well be an infinite number of true answers. Usually, there is some wiggle room for two possible answers, though. More than two is simply unacceptable, though. Hence the mode of counting is one, more than one, infinity.
Click to expand...

For all philosophers?
Click to expand...

Every last one of them. Relativists see counting as an objectivist obsession. objectivists see truth as unitary and so on and so forth. I know this because I've read every single book of philosophy ever written, so you don't need to check for yourself.
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
originally posted by Cliff:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
By the law of non-contradiction, truth is unitary: a proposition is either accurate or not, true or not. If a question has more than one possible true answer, then one can never know what the true answer is. There might as well be an infinite number of true answers. Usually, there is some wiggle room for two possible answers, though. More than two is simply unacceptable, though. Hence the mode of counting is one, more than one, infinity.
Click to expand...

For all philosophers?
Click to expand...

Every last one of them. Relativists see counting as an objectivist obsession. objectivists see truth as unitary and so on and so forth. I know this because I've read every single book of philosophy ever written, so you don't need to check for yourself.
Click to expand...

Is this equivalent to saying that you've read more than one? In that case I have read them all, too.
 
originally posted by Cole Kendall:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
originally posted by Cliff:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
By the law of non-contradiction, truth is unitary: a proposition is either accurate or not, true or not. If a question has more than one possible true answer, then one can never know what the true answer is. There might as well be an infinite number of true answers. Usually, there is some wiggle room for two possible answers, though. More than two is simply unacceptable, though. Hence the mode of counting is one, more than one, infinity.
Click to expand...

For all philosophers?
Click to expand...

Every last one of them. Relativists see counting as an objectivist obsession. objectivists see truth as unitary and so on and so forth. I know this because I've read every single book of philosophy ever written, so you don't need to check for yourself.
Click to expand...

Is this equivalent to saying that you've read more than one? In that case I have read them all, too.
Click to expand...

I never claimed to be a philosopher. I do have field informants, however. But if you are a philosopher, then I assent to your position.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top