kirk wallace
kirk wallace
I felt like the tsunami sub-thread was inundating the WDYDLN thread. So it deserved its own.
On the "overdue" question, I found this part of Kathryn Schulz's follow up very helpful :
"Are we overdue for the Cascadia earthquake?
No, although I heard that word a lot after the piece was published. As DOGAMI’s Ian Madin told me, “You’re not overdue for an earthquake until you’re three standard deviations beyond the mean”—which, in the case of the full-margin Cascadia earthquake, means eight hundred years from now. (In the case of the “smaller” Cascadia earthquake, the magnitude 8.0 to 8.6 that would affect only the southern part of the zone, we’re currently one standard deviation beyond the mean.) That doesn’t mean that the quake won’t happen tomorrow; it just means we are not “overdue” in any meaningful sense. The odds I cite in the story are correct: there is a thirty-per-cent chance of the M8.08.6 Cascadia earthquake and a ten-per-cent chance of the M8.79.2 earthquake in the next fifty years. "
Schulz present a "handy chart from DOGAMI showing the earthquake history on the Cascadia subduction zone and our own current location on that time line." You can see it here:
http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Schulz-The-Big-One-Map-41.png
The whole follow up is, I think, very good. It is here:
http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/how-to-stay-safe-when-the-big-one-comes
Note particularly the line about airborne wine bottles.
On the "overdue" question, I found this part of Kathryn Schulz's follow up very helpful :
"Are we overdue for the Cascadia earthquake?
No, although I heard that word a lot after the piece was published. As DOGAMI’s Ian Madin told me, “You’re not overdue for an earthquake until you’re three standard deviations beyond the mean”—which, in the case of the full-margin Cascadia earthquake, means eight hundred years from now. (In the case of the “smaller” Cascadia earthquake, the magnitude 8.0 to 8.6 that would affect only the southern part of the zone, we’re currently one standard deviation beyond the mean.) That doesn’t mean that the quake won’t happen tomorrow; it just means we are not “overdue” in any meaningful sense. The odds I cite in the story are correct: there is a thirty-per-cent chance of the M8.08.6 Cascadia earthquake and a ten-per-cent chance of the M8.79.2 earthquake in the next fifty years. "
Schulz present a "handy chart from DOGAMI showing the earthquake history on the Cascadia subduction zone and our own current location on that time line." You can see it here:
http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Schulz-The-Big-One-Map-41.png
The whole follow up is, I think, very good. It is here:
http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/how-to-stay-safe-when-the-big-one-comes
Note particularly the line about airborne wine bottles.