originally posted by Marc D:
I like it.
You are almost forced to engage the wine guy or waiter about the list, and that has to be good.
Wine should be fun, less serious and maybe about discovery. I think that is what they are going for.
originally posted by robert ames:
montepulciano d'abruzzo for $81. uff da. roll up your sleeve and bend over. . . .to quote firesign theatre.
originally posted by Kay Bixler:
What's wrong with good old professional hospitality?
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
originally posted by Kay Bixler:
What's wrong with good old professional hospitality?
Not enough #hipster
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
originally posted by Kay Bixler:
What's wrong with good old professional hospitality?
Not enough #hipster
originally posted by JasonA:
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
originally posted by Kay Bixler:
What's wrong with good old professional hospitality?
Not enough #hipster
Hipster is out. Millennials_of_NY is in. Or LA in this case
originally posted by mark e:
It is indeed a baffling document. I suspect that there are actually some interesting wines on the list; we just haven't a clue exactly what they are.
It is too bad that they didn't interview the buyer to get some insight into why he would arrange the written list that way.
Having been ITB, I would say the list's biggest defect is that amount of time the staff would have to engage with the table . . . would ½ hour suffice? Do diners want to take notes and fill in the missing pieces? Who knows?
Here is an extract from a menu at a local restaurant. It is also nutty because instead of giving the farm name it lists the first name of the farm's owner. WHY???? In both cases their logic escapes me.
![]()
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
originally posted by JasonA:
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
originally posted by Kay Bixler:
What's wrong with good old professional hospitality?
Not enough #hipster
Hipster is out. Millennials_of_NY is in. Or LA in this case
It really is interesting that the term hipster has lasted as long as it has.
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by mark e:
It is indeed a baffling document. I suspect that there are actually some interesting wines on the list; we just haven't a clue exactly what they are.
It is too bad that they didn't interview the buyer to get some insight into why he would arrange the written list that way.
Having been ITB, I would say the list's biggest defect is that amount of time the staff would have to engage with the table . . . would ½ hour suffice? Do diners want to take notes and fill in the missing pieces? Who knows?
Here is an extract from a menu at a local restaurant. It is also nutty because instead of giving the farm name it lists the first name of the farm's owner. WHY???? In both cases their logic escapes me.
![]()
Ha!
Where is that? Why wouldn't they include Brinkley on the first name basis?