Current fav

Florida Jim

Florida Jim
2013 Idlewild, Grenache Gris, Gibson Ranch, Mendocino
12.9% abv, shoulder-high dry framed vines over 100 years old, low nutrient gravely loam, hot micro climate similar to the southern Rhone; this variety is rare in the Old World, rarer still in the New.

Winemaking:
The bins are lightly foot tread and then gassed and sealed for seven days of carbonic maceration. As soon as the fruit begins to show its lifted aromatics of blood oranges and spice, the fruit is thoroughly foot tread and left for an additional three days of fermentation on skins and stems. The must is pressed a touch sweet and left to finish fermenting at a cool temperature to protect the delicate aromatics. The wine was aged for four months in neutral French oak prior to bottling.

Notes:
Often called a rose, this is in fact, a light red wine. Red and black fruit dominate with blood orange aromatic accents and with considerable mineral and spice notes in the mouth and on the finish. Energetic on the palate, solid acidity and a layered complexity. Shows some light tannin on the finish.
Reminds me some of older Overnoy or Tissot.

$28 retail from the winery.

I have tasted the '12, '13 and '14 versions; while slightly different from each other, all are worth a try. Unfortunately, this winery is giving up this fruit source so the '14 is the last from Idlewild.

Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Current fav2013 Idlewild, Grenache Gris, Gibson Ranch, Mendocino...
Reminds me some of older Overnoy or Tissot.

Do you mean aged Overnoy/Tissot or the Overnoy/Tissot wines as they used to be made? If the former, I'm not sure that's a complement for a 2013 wine!
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Current fav2013 Idlewild, Grenache Gris, Gibson Ranch, Mendocino...
Reminds me some of older Overnoy or Tissot.

Do you mean aged Overnoy/Tissot or the Overnoy/Tissot wines as they used to be made? If the former, I'm not sure that's a complement for a 2013 wine!

Last Overnoy or Tissot I've had is 1997; I know nothing since.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Rahsaan, the grammar patrol requests, with the delicacy befitting veterans, your attention to the use of complement.

The diction patrol hastens to add, diplomatically, that this is not grammar.
 
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Rahsaan, the grammar patrol requests, with the delicacy befitting veterans, your attention to the use of complement.

The diction patrol hastens to add, diplomatically, that this is not grammar.

The usage patrol adds that diction has nothing to do with it.
 
originally posted by Cole Kendall:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Rahsaan, the grammar patrol requests, with the delicacy befitting veterans, your attention to the use of complement.

The diction patrol hastens to add, diplomatically, that this is not grammar.

The usage patrol adds that diction has nothing to do with it.

I thought of this - 'usage' is the word SFJoe would have applied. But I checked the definition of diction before I wrote, and it serves adequately.

Cheers.
 
Actually, this is all about spelling, which is neither grammar nor usage and certainly not diction. Of course, if you take the spelling to be correct, then the error could be either (completely incoherent) grammar or (absolutely baffling) usage, but, really, spelling seems to be the issue.
 
Back
Top