Is Paris burnin'?

Oswaldo Costa

Oswaldo Costa
Spent the first week of this month there, family in tow, under the pretext of visiting schools (we might conceivably move there). This time we elected to stay in the 11éme, a less charming neighborhood, closer to what it would be like to live in Paris without spending so much of a fortune. Even so, the riotous palette of palate palaces was dazzling, even for the jaded warrior. In no other city are there so many establishments per square kilometer dedicated to liquid and solid modes of artisanal pleasure.

After leaving our luggage at our Airbnb, we set off for a stroll in the nearby Rue de la Folie-Méricourt, where the legendary Michel Mouilherat used to have his La Cave de L'Insolite. It was there, in 2006, that he gave us an epiphanic bottle of Overnoy 99 Ploussard to take back to Brazil, refusing to be paid because he was not sure it would survive the trip (it never had to).

La Cave de L'Insolite still exists, transformed by its new owners into a simpatico wine bar. Bottles of the usual suspects continue to grace its shelves, but the former grungy thrill is gone, replaced by a brisk nation-of-shopkeeper competence that, nevertheless, remains attractive to those who live outside the epicenters of epicurean épiceries. Speaking of which, a few more steps towards the trendy Oberkampf Boulevard brought us to the recently opened Verre Volé épicerie, where we merrily filled our shopping bags to provision our first evening (we stayed in a lot, to simulate domesticity).

At the Airbnb on October 3, with pork rillette, onion jam, a pair of decidedly delicious raw milk cheeses and baguettes, we sipped:
NV Jacques Lassaigne Les Vignes de Montgueux Extra Brut Blanc de Blancs 12%
Lovely aroma, mineral-driven, white flowers and brioche. Good acidity, but finishes a little bitter. Could use a touch more body, but killer nose.
2013 Clos des Vignes du Maynes (Julien Guillot) Macon-Cruzille Cuvée 910 11.8%
Carbonically fragrant. Good acidity, pleasant bitterness, could also use a touch more body. Not great, but very glou glou.

Sigh, no matter how well one may eat and drink in the new world, and even most of the old, it seems like a simulacrum of a die that was cast here. Even less talented chefs can make supremely edible fare when the quality of ingredients attends the needs of a nation of exacting eaters.

At the Airbnb on October 4, with leftovers from the previous evening and some new cheeses:
2014 Catherine & Dominique Derain Saint-Aubin Le Ban 12.5%
Very aromatic, smells semi-carbonic. Excellent mouthfeel, body & balance. Not particularly noteworthy, but tasty.

At the Airbnb on October 5, with more cheese, charcuterie and bread:
2014 Domaine de la Banjoulière Aramon La Prairie 10.5%
From a winery between Montpelier and Narbonne, our first Aramon varietal. Lightly colored, like a cloudy rosé. Strawberry aroma. Quite acidic, but not too much. Light, but decent body. Refreshing like a tart fruit juice, reminiscent of some racy Poulsards. Went great with a baked raw milk Mont d’Or.

On October 6, we decided to give the new incarnation of Cave de l’Insolite a try. Food was good, but uninspired. Wine choices turned out equally uninspired:
NV (2014) Jean-Pierre Robinot l'Opera des Vins Les Années (pet nat) 12%
Slight funkiness in the aroma, otherwise surprisingly unaromatic (or closed), with a bit of hay and yeasts. Pleasant mouthfeel, but abrupt finish. Uninteresting, especially from someone so wacky.
2011 Les Chais du Vieux Bourg (Ludwig Bindernagel) Côtes du Jura Poulsard 11.2%
Eek, H2S alert, rotten eggs up the wazoo. Last bottle, so could not try another. Since bottles to take home are half price at Insolite, I asked our enterprising waiter to rebottle the contents @50% off for doggy consumption, praying it might be OK a day later. To fill the voioid, we tried a bottle of:
2012 Sébastien Bobinet Saumur-Champigny Ruben 12.5%
Leather enough to make a crew of Hell’s Angels blush. Attractive mouthfeel, decent acidity and weight. Did the job.

On October 7, lunch at Jeanne A (recommended by Aaron @Not Drinking Poison)
2014 Domaine Ott Am Berg Grüner Veltliner (by the glass)
Attractive mineral/floral aroma. Slightly more sweet than acid, a bit opulent, but nice enough.
2014 Pierre Marie Chermette Brouilly Pierreux 13% (by the bottle)
Aroma shows lactic and confectionary notes, not promising. However, excellent mouthfeel, with plenty of acidity, attractive fruit, and just the right sweetness. Leafy without being sappy.

At the Airbnb on October 7:
2005 Chateau Yvonne Saumur Blanc 13%
Lovely and complex aroma, flint, hay, citrus, white flowers, chamomile. Light CO2 fizz. Good balance and weight. A mini-Brézé, quite beautiful.
2011 Les Chais du Vieux Bourg (Ludwig Bindernagel) Côtes du Jura Poulsard 11.2%
Brought home from the previous evening, the H2S had completely disappeared, but the liquid seemed a little lifeless, as if the critters had sapped its élan.

On October 8, lunch at 116, an anomalous natural wine restaurant near the Champs Elysées:
2013 Ganevat Plein Sud (Trousseau) Côtes du Jura 10.5%
Cranberry/pomegranate, bramble. More tart than sweet, lightish body. Nice, but does not justify 53 price tag. Went ok with wagyu hamburgers.

On October 9, dinner at Repaire du Cartouche. Food was good, not great, our waiter was extremely nice, but not wine savvy. The wine list had an impressive selection of attractive wines in the 30/35 area.
LC09 Jacques Prévost La Closerie Les Beguines extra brut 12.5%
Aroma more serious, but less attractive, than the Lassaigne. Yeast and almonds.
2009 Clos de Tue Boeuf (Puzelat) La Guerrerie
Côt/Gamay blend. Leather and herbs, would have guessed cab franc. Good body and acidity.

At the end of the week, looking back, the experience had not been as good as the shop windows promised. The mixture of high expectations and embarras du choix is decidedly a bitch.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Is Paris burnin'?...we elected to stay in the 11éme, a less charming neighborhood...

Disregarding the typo and the fact that there are many neighborhoods within the 11th, frame of reference is very important because I have to ask which areas you think are more charming? Personally, I like the blend of centrality, high level gastro shopping and lack of annoying tourists that you can get in the 11th. But I haven't seriously contemplated my ideal Paris neighborhood in many years!

And I do sympathize with the challenge of being there for a short time and being overwhelmed with wine and food choices. The struggles we endure!
 
Hey, we overlapped for a few days! I was even staying in the same 'hood. Next time I'll have my publicist send you my itinerary.

I agree with Rahsaan though. I'm no expert on the city, but in my personal experience the 11th spans a rather diverse set of neighborhoods. I enjoy staying there and often do.

I do hear grumbling about gentrification that that part of Paris, but I live in SF. So I'm well used to the bobos.
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Is Paris burnin'?...we elected to stay in the 11éme, a less charming neighborhood...

Disregarding the typo and the fact that there are many neighborhoods within the 11th, frame of reference is very important because I have to ask which areas you think are more charming? Personally, I like the blend of centrality, high level gastro shopping and lack of annoying tourists that you can get in the 11th. But I haven't seriously contemplated my ideal Paris neighborhood in many years!

And I do sympathize with the challenge of being there for a short time and being overwhelmed with wine and food choices. The struggles we endure!

What typo (he asks, fists on hips)? The area around the Boulevard Voltaire and Richard Lenoir is a bit dowdy, imo, compared to the left bank, especially St. Germain and the 6éme, where buildings are more attractive, people dress better, shop windows are classier, hairstyles are groovier, and one sees less locals prematurely turned into Keith Richards by hipster chain smoking.
 
originally posted by slaton:
Hey, we overlapped for a few days! I was even staying in the same 'hood. Next time I'll have my publicist send you my itinerary.

I agree with Rahsaan though. I'm no expert on the city, but in my personal experience the 11th spans a rather diverse set of neighborhoods. I enjoy staying there and often do.

I do hear grumbling about gentrification that that part of Paris, but I live in SF. So I'm well used to the bobos.

Bummer! Would have been fun to meet in these circumstances, since our trip to the Bay Area in June was more rushed.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Is Paris burnin'?...we elected to stay in the 11éme, a less charming neighborhood...

Disregarding the typo and the fact that there are many neighborhoods within the 11th, frame of reference is very important because I have to ask which areas you think are more charming? Personally, I like the blend of centrality, high level gastro shopping and lack of annoying tourists that you can get in the 11th. But I haven't seriously contemplated my ideal Paris neighborhood in many years!

And I do sympathize with the challenge of being there for a short time and being overwhelmed with wine and food choices. The struggles we endure!

What typo (he asks, fists on hips)?

11éme instead of 11ème, I believe. But usually written 11e, no?
 
originally posted by mark e:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Is Paris burnin'?...we elected to stay in the 11éme, a less charming neighborhood...

Disregarding the typo and the fact that there are many neighborhoods within the 11th, frame of reference is very important because I have to ask which areas you think are more charming? Personally, I like the blend of centrality, high level gastro shopping and lack of annoying tourists that you can get in the 11th. But I haven't seriously contemplated my ideal Paris neighborhood in many years!

And I do sympathize with the challenge of being there for a short time and being overwhelmed with wine and food choices. The struggles we endure!

What typo (he asks, fists on hips)?

11éme instead of 11ème, I believe. But usually written 11e, no?

Good lord, that's worse than Trebianno! But I will stand corrected like a man, without claiming to be typing rapidly in an airport.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
originally posted by mark e:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Is Paris burnin'?...we elected to stay in the 11éme, a less charming neighborhood...

Disregarding the typo and the fact that there are many neighborhoods within the 11th, frame of reference is very important because I have to ask which areas you think are more charming? Personally, I like the blend of centrality, high level gastro shopping and lack of annoying tourists that you can get in the 11th. But I haven't seriously contemplated my ideal Paris neighborhood in many years!

And I do sympathize with the challenge of being there for a short time and being overwhelmed with wine and food choices. The struggles we endure!

What typo (he asks, fists on hips)?

11éme instead of 11ème, I believe. But usually written 11e, no?

Good lord, that's worse than Trebianno! But I will stand corrected like a man, without claiming to be typing rapidly in an airport.

Sure, agreed. But 'cmon, I don't see all that much difference between writing tommorow and Trebianno.
 
Formally, perhaps not, but maybe the egregiousness of a misspelling is proportional to the frequency with the word appears in everyday use.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:

Good lord, that's worse than Trebianno! But I will stand corrected like a man, without claiming to be typing rapidly in an airport.

Ha!

And I like your point about Keith Richards.

Luckily, in a fine city like Paris, there are enough neighborhoods to suit all tastes. Sort of.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa: and one sees less locals prematurely turned into Keith Richards by hipster chain smoking.

Eh, hm. Where have the usage police gone? Not blaming Keith (or airports) for this one.
 
originally posted by kirk wallace:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa: and one sees less locals prematurely turned into Keith Richards by hipster chain smoking.

Eh, hm. Where have the usage police gone? Not blaming Keith (or airports) for this one.

There are fewer and fewer of them every day.
 
originally posted by kirk wallace:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa: and one sees less locals prematurely turned into Keith Richards by hipster chain smoking.

Eh, hm. Where have the usage police gone? Not blaming Keith (or airports) for this one.

What misusage (he asks, fists on hips)?
 
Oswaldo,

For reference, if you can count the items, there are a number of them and if the number is lower, there are fewer. If it's an uncountable amount, there is more or less of it. Thus there may be fewer drops of water in the ocean in the summer than in the winter (or a greater number for all I know), but less water (or more).

For tomorrow's lesson, we learn to distinguish between "which" and "that."
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
Oswaldo,

For reference, if you can count the items, there are a number of them and if the number is lower, there are fewer. If it's an uncountable amount, there is more or less of it. Thus there may be fewer drops of water in the ocean in the summer than in the winter (or a greater number for all I know), but less water (or more).

For tomorrow's lesson, we learn to distinguish between "which" and "that."

Thanks prof. I need to be reminded of these things.
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
Oswaldo,

For reference, if you can count the items, there are a number of them and if the number is lower, there are fewer. If it's an uncountable amount, there is more or less of it. Thus there may be fewer drops of water in the ocean in the summer than in the winter (or a greater number for all I know), but less water (or more).

For tomorrow's lesson, we learn to distinguish between "which" and "that."

it's astonishing to me the misuse of "then" and "than"i see on other boards and work emails.

(hoping there's no errors in that sentence)
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
Oswaldo,

For reference, if you can count the items, there are a number of them and if the number is lower, there are fewer. If it's an uncountable amount, there is more or less of it. Thus there may be fewer drops of water in the ocean in the summer than in the winter (or a greater number for all I know), but less water (or more).

For tomorrow's lesson, we learn to distinguish between "which" and "that."

Best laugh of the day.
 
Back
Top