[deleted]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unknown
  • Start date Start date
Now wait a minute. Let's consider this proposed portfolio carefully.

If drinking Vinfolio's Top 100 Collectible Wines is like drinking and cellaring more points than we would otherwise be able to identify on our own to drink and cellar, and we are all for drinking and cellaring more points because more points is better than less, then a fortiori we should take a look at this list.

A caveat is that each wine has to have at least 92 points (now, or as predicted at its peak, by whichever wine critic gave the wine the most points); otherwise that would make me doubt the veracity and purpose of identifying the Top 100. 92 points of course being the minimum acceptable number of points to drink and cellar. (As a side note I have been looking forward most eagerly to collecting and selling all of my 92+ point bottles, unless I drink them of course. For ones that are not yet 92+ points I will wait patiently, knowing that a wine critic has predicted they will be.)

But with that caveat why not give the Top 100 a spin?
 
originally posted by Jayson Cohen:
Now wait a minute. Let's consider this proposed portfolio carefully.

If drinking Vinfolio's Top 100 Collectible Wines is like drinking and cellaring more points than we would otherwise be able to identify on our own to drink and cellar, and we are all for drinking and cellaring more points because more points is better than less, then a fortiori we should take a look at this list.

A caveat is that each wine has to have at least 92 points (now, or as predicted at its peak, by whichever wine critic gave the wine the most points); otherwise that would make me doubt the veracity and purpose of identifying the Top 100. 92 points of course being the minimum acceptable number of points to drink and cellar. (As a side note I have been looking forward most eagerly to collecting and selling all of my 92+ point bottles, unless I drink them of course. For ones that are not yet 92+ points I will wait patiently, knowing that a wine critic has predicted they will be.)

But with that caveat why not give the Top 100 a spin?
Click to expand...
Ice cream doesn't have bones.
 
No , it does not.

But the right ice cream could have 94 points (good) while the wrong ice cream would have 93 points (bad). As far as Kay is concerned. I'm ok if the ice cream is 92+ points personally. As long as there are no bones.
 
originally posted by Jayson Cohen:
Now wait a minute. Let's consider this proposed portfolio carefully.

because more points is better than less, then a fortiori we should take a look at this list.
Click to expand...

"fewer points": less sand on the beach but fewer grains of sand. Unless of course "points" can't be numbered and the word is just a metaphor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top