Levi Dalton
Levi Dalton
Quinto Chionetti, who was acknowledged as one of the finest Dolcetto producers and an icon of the Dogliani zone, died this past September. In November there was a tribute retrospective of the Chionetti wines, and I was in attendance. The winery began cru bottlings in the 1970s. In a sad turn in the winery history, Quinto's son and granddaughter were both killed in a car accident in 1988. After that happened, Quinto returned to take up the reigns of the winery that his son had been more involved in since the 1970s. Quinto eventually had more help from his daughter-in-law, who left her other profession to help at the winery in 1999, and from his grandson Nicola, who took over the winery in 2013. Nicola was present for the retrospective.
In the last two years the winery has made two purchases of Barolo vines (with one parcel in Bussia and another in Parussi), so there will be Chionetti Barolo released in the future.
The tasting went youngest vintage to oldest. A * means I particularly enjoyed it.
2015 San Luigi Dogliani
There is more clay in the soil of the San Luigi parcel than in Briccolero. Today the San Luigi vines are 20 years old. San Luigi is vinified in stainless and matured with no oak (in the future they may move back to concrete).
Lifted aromatics of macerated cherries and bramble, also wild strawberries. Some coffee ground hints. Turns a bit gangly and simple on the finish. I am not so into this.
2015 Briccolero Dogliani
They use a percentage of used French oak botte for the Briccolero (3000 L).
More restrained, more nuanced, and more interesting than the 2015 San Luigi. There is an older vine character here. A decent wine that misses greatness, for me.
2014 San Luigi
Mostly on the fruit up front, with plum and spicy fruit. Finish gets a little strained.
2014 Briccolero
Noticeably more developed than the 2015 Briccolero. A bit of yellow fruit on the nose. Some smokiness. More of a red fruit character on the palate.
2013 San Luigi
Simple nose and a straightforward palate. Macerated cherry and hints of cardamom. Short finish.
2013 Briccolero
Big and plump nose, with big fruit. Speaks to a warmer vintage. Hints of fine coffee grounds.
* 2011 San Luigi
Some reduction on the nose. This has a darker nose than the younger vintages do, and also deeper fruit and more serious structure. Dark cherry, as well as some fruit that is more bright. Some cooking chocolate. Clearly this is attempting serious Dolcetto status. The finish is straightforward and simple, though.
2011 Briccolero
Smells like a different animal than the younger vintages. The nose is restrained, and seems a bit bruised- possibly this is not the best bottle of this. Deep fruit and a smokey accent. The volatility here is a bit odd- again, perhaps not the best showing for this.
2010 Briccolero
Pruney. Some alcohol showing. This is moving into secondary development, and the primary fruit is receeding. Not particularly harmonious today- perhaps catching this wine at an odd moment, with the alcohol showing. This does show more integration with some air. Perhaps this just needs a little more bottle age to get through this phase.
2008 Briccolero
Said to have been a difficult year.
Has the darker fruit of the 2011, also with some red fruit. This was a hand carry from Italy, and may not be showing well- there is a milky character here that is distracting, and the nose is somewhat off.
2003 Briccolero
The winery irrigated in 2003, the only year that they have done so.
Evolved and meaty. Aspects of twigs. Oxidative notes on the nose and on the palate. There is some level of freshness here, but the wine is not super appealing at the moment.
2005 San Luigi and 2004 San Luigi
Both corked, unfortunately.
* 1998 Briccolero
A good wine that is showing well, if a bit soft. In the zone for drinking now. The nose is nuanced, complex, and developed. A hint of sweetness on the mid-palate that is appealing. A very appealing mix of mint and sage on the finish.
* 1996 San Luigi
Soft, but appealing. I can imagine this might have been better drunk a couple of years ago, but it is still good. Mostly on the red fruit, not with the dark or compact notes that Briccolero can show at times. The fruit that it has is refined and red in tone. A bit of mint and sage. This is not a wine of gravitas, and it is soft, but it is also very appealing as a pleasant drink.
Overall this tasting was a bit of a mixed bag, but from those 1990s vintages I did come away with some idea of the kinds of wines that made Chionetti famous. And there was more reinforcement for the idea that I have that well done Dolcetto can evolve nicely with 15 or so years in the bottle. I have had examples from other wineries as well that have proved the point for me.
In the last two years the winery has made two purchases of Barolo vines (with one parcel in Bussia and another in Parussi), so there will be Chionetti Barolo released in the future.
The tasting went youngest vintage to oldest. A * means I particularly enjoyed it.
2015 San Luigi Dogliani
There is more clay in the soil of the San Luigi parcel than in Briccolero. Today the San Luigi vines are 20 years old. San Luigi is vinified in stainless and matured with no oak (in the future they may move back to concrete).
Lifted aromatics of macerated cherries and bramble, also wild strawberries. Some coffee ground hints. Turns a bit gangly and simple on the finish. I am not so into this.
2015 Briccolero Dogliani
They use a percentage of used French oak botte for the Briccolero (3000 L).
More restrained, more nuanced, and more interesting than the 2015 San Luigi. There is an older vine character here. A decent wine that misses greatness, for me.
2014 San Luigi
Mostly on the fruit up front, with plum and spicy fruit. Finish gets a little strained.
2014 Briccolero
Noticeably more developed than the 2015 Briccolero. A bit of yellow fruit on the nose. Some smokiness. More of a red fruit character on the palate.
2013 San Luigi
Simple nose and a straightforward palate. Macerated cherry and hints of cardamom. Short finish.
2013 Briccolero
Big and plump nose, with big fruit. Speaks to a warmer vintage. Hints of fine coffee grounds.
* 2011 San Luigi
Some reduction on the nose. This has a darker nose than the younger vintages do, and also deeper fruit and more serious structure. Dark cherry, as well as some fruit that is more bright. Some cooking chocolate. Clearly this is attempting serious Dolcetto status. The finish is straightforward and simple, though.
2011 Briccolero
Smells like a different animal than the younger vintages. The nose is restrained, and seems a bit bruised- possibly this is not the best bottle of this. Deep fruit and a smokey accent. The volatility here is a bit odd- again, perhaps not the best showing for this.
2010 Briccolero
Pruney. Some alcohol showing. This is moving into secondary development, and the primary fruit is receeding. Not particularly harmonious today- perhaps catching this wine at an odd moment, with the alcohol showing. This does show more integration with some air. Perhaps this just needs a little more bottle age to get through this phase.
2008 Briccolero
Said to have been a difficult year.
Has the darker fruit of the 2011, also with some red fruit. This was a hand carry from Italy, and may not be showing well- there is a milky character here that is distracting, and the nose is somewhat off.
2003 Briccolero
The winery irrigated in 2003, the only year that they have done so.
Evolved and meaty. Aspects of twigs. Oxidative notes on the nose and on the palate. There is some level of freshness here, but the wine is not super appealing at the moment.
2005 San Luigi and 2004 San Luigi
Both corked, unfortunately.
* 1998 Briccolero
A good wine that is showing well, if a bit soft. In the zone for drinking now. The nose is nuanced, complex, and developed. A hint of sweetness on the mid-palate that is appealing. A very appealing mix of mint and sage on the finish.
* 1996 San Luigi
Soft, but appealing. I can imagine this might have been better drunk a couple of years ago, but it is still good. Mostly on the red fruit, not with the dark or compact notes that Briccolero can show at times. The fruit that it has is refined and red in tone. A bit of mint and sage. This is not a wine of gravitas, and it is soft, but it is also very appealing as a pleasant drink.
Overall this tasting was a bit of a mixed bag, but from those 1990s vintages I did come away with some idea of the kinds of wines that made Chionetti famous. And there was more reinforcement for the idea that I have that well done Dolcetto can evolve nicely with 15 or so years in the bottle. I have had examples from other wineries as well that have proved the point for me.