Keith Levenberg
Keith Levenberg
Good read from Jasper Morris: http://www.worldoffinewine.com/news/the-golden-age-of-burgundy-6102566/
More like the diamond age thenoriginally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Does "golden age' refer to the cost?
originally posted by Tom Blach:
There has been a revolution in this millennium and I think the lesser wines can often now make an excellent substitute for what has become unaffordable, but drinking an unutterably grandiose and insouciant Richebourg 93 from Hudelot-Noellat last night I did wonder if such a wine could be made nowadays. Hudelot had no problem at all with plenty of fertiliser and big yields, which meant that his village wines at this time were absolute crap, but this was as grand, if not as refined (or indeed as clean) a burgundy as one could ever hope to meet, stunningly physical stuff.[/quote
tom--i'm trying to find your logic. you say that his village wines were crap because of high yields and plenty of fertilizer, but his grand crus then were beyond what is achievable today? should not his grand crus back then be diminished for the same reasons?
how could the grand crus not suffer from the same abuse? certainly we are not to infer that that is what grand crus need to be sublime.