Guigal perspective

Peter Creasey

Peter Creasey
I've seen some disparaging comments here in general terms toward Guigal.

There are numerous offerings that run counter to generalizing in a negative way against Guigal. Nice Cote du Rhones (some barely over $10), Condrieus, Dorianes, Chateauneufs, Cote Roties, and so on.

One case in point would be the E Guigal Cote-Rotie Brune et Blonde '88 we had last night. Outflowing bouquet with lots of personality, melange of flavors, some meatiness, earth, bacon, leather, enjoyable bounciness of flavors, etc., etc. Very enjoyable both before dinner as well as with venison sausage, roasted peaches, and sauteed kale. [A-]

. . . . . Pete
 
Yes, I liked the base level Cote-Rotie back in the 80s and early 90s too. Less more recently. I also don't know if I would like those older vintages now as I have become more oak averse.
 
Pete, his sources have changed. That '88 includes wine that is, nowadays, bottled separately by its vigneron.

Guigal was always heavy-handed with oak, and that is nonsense for most folks on this board.

I wouldn't pin my hopes on the low-acid, greasy Doriane.
 
I knew that he had lost most of his good sources for CdP since first the 90s and then moreso the beginning of this century. I guess it makes sense that the same thing happened with his other wines for which he doesn't own vineyards.
 
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
Yes, I liked the base level Cote-Rotie back in the 80s and early 90s too. Less more recently. I also don't know if I would like those older vintages now as I have become more oak averse.
I was thinking exactly this yesterday in the other thread. About the 1988. I really loved it in the late 1990s. But now I suspect I would pick up and hate the use of cultured yeast, enzymes, and oak that I think likely shape it’s profile almost as much as the fruit.
 
Surprised to hear the comments about oak. Somehow, I guess I've missed picking up on that characteristic in the past...certainly no recollection of oak last night with the Brune et Blonde '88.

I tasted the La La's a few weeks ago and, yes, there was oak showing there. Given the pricing, I didn't give them much thought (or attention).

Interesting!

. . . . . Pete
 
I don't think there was that much oak used in '80s Guigal, outside of LaLaLand. They were decent wines with character and typicite selling at very reasonable prices.
 
originally posted by MarkS:
I don't think there was that much oak used in '80s Guigal, outside of LaLaLand. They were decent wines with character and typicite selling at very reasonable prices.

I have no knowledge of any kind to contest this claim with. I do remember a certain creaminess to the wine that, if I tasted today, I might want to attribute to some form of intervention. But memory is fallible and my knowledge of what winemaking techniques lead to what tastes is somewhat less than comprehensive.
 
Coincidentally, the '88 Brune et Blonde was the last Guigal wine I bought. I wish I'd had the patience to wait until now to open it... In my limited experience, the LaLas have always shown glossy young due to the NFO. John Livingstone-Learmonth has for whatever reason given the LaLas a pass, a subject that has elicited many electrons on this bored in years past. I don't know about the current crop of Guigal wines, but there are so many other interesting producers in the N Rhone that I see little motivation to go for negoce wines, especially Guigal's.

Mark Lipton
 
Back in 2010 my idea of what northern Rhône syrah ought to be was still molded by the many Brune & Blondes and several LaLas I had drunk in the previous decade. In his search for Parker points, Guigal changed the perception of an appellation in the minds of the point seekers (like me) who didn't know better. So, even if his wines from the 80s are more in tune with "our" palate, or other vintages have absorbed their repugnantly abundant nfo, I don't want to support someone who I see as a suit-wearing money-grubbing big-time producer with a corny technological winery who distorted the perception of an appellation. But I won't contest charges that I should be punishing myself instead of him.

As for my old syrah paradigm, Eric usefully scolded me on two occasions in 2010:

From me:
2007 Pierre Gonon Saint-Joseph 13.0%
According to the Chambers Street write-up, Gonon is included by John Livingstone-Learmonth, "the foremost writer on the Northern Rhone," in his STGT group - Soil to Glass Transfer, "along with Clape, Chave, Balthazar, Barge and a few others." Uncorked ninety minutes before dinner, the bottleneck was so mute that it immediately joined the STDG group - Soil to Decanter Transfer. At show time the genie was still fast asleep, but into the glass it went, venting its annoyance in the form of tar and rubber exhalations, shouting down the timid supporting cast of cherry and cloves. Luckily the mouth brought compensatory pleasures: fine acidity, good weight, and good acid/sweet balance. The tannins, however, are a bit too light. Where's the grip? Where are your gonads, Gonon? With cheese, a strange chemical note appears, like naphtalene or Baygon, but disappears after ten minutes, right before this was about to join the Soil to Sink Transfer group. Not one to harbor a grudge, I let Baygons be bygones and enjoy the rest of the bottle because it begins to hit it stride, bringing more cherry fruit to the fore and a late note of leafy eucalyptus. All in all, a curious experience, showing how past virtues - lack of wood or supermaturity - are no guarantee of future performance. Unless, of course, the future comes later.

Oswaldo Costa at 02-03-10 5:17am [edit]

From Eric:
Really, no one can think of waiting a little more than 2 weeks before drinking an old school northern rhone syrah?

A lot of 85s were not very tannic, extracted, high alcohol wines. Juge, gentaz or verset were in fact very delicate wines from the begining. They drank ok during the few monthes following the bottling, and then began to show that weird phase very typical of whole cluster syrahs. But for the past 15 years they have been a real joy to drink, and therefore I drank a lot.

Believe it or not, "Natural" syrah boys don't produce old school syrahs.
Their style is in fact very recent and modern according to my tasting history of Northern rhone wines.

I don't think it is a very good idea to consider the wines from gonon as a carbonic fruit salad. BTW we had a 1995 with David L. with Jean Gonon at their place a few days ago. I bet it tasted mutted 12 years ago, and that a lot of early stage syrah drinkers had to go for an Overnoy at that time. But today, no need to go for Jura. This one was plenty satisfying...

From me:
A Côte Rôtie in St. Joseph's Clothing
2004 Patrick Jasmin Côte Rôtie 12.5%
Blackberry, a bit of funk, and a hint of oak vanilla. Good acidity and balance, very enjoyable in an unpretentious vein. My only gripe has to do with my expectations more than the wine. Côte Rôtie has an associated gravitas that this doesn't deliver, being closer to fresh and light, perhaps more like a St. Joseph. Here, I would want more extraction, more weight, I don't know, more balls. Where's the beefiness?

From Eric:
I hope I am not being rude, but why do you want your northern rhone wines to have a chateauneuf structure?

Northern rhone is a cool area (more like beaujolais, than mediteranean like southern rhone in terms of climate) and wines tend to be on the light side unless one uses all the modern winemaking tricks in order to get extracted wines.

Beefiness for Côte Rotie? But traditionnal Cote Rotie is all about minerality violet and iodine. Beefiness is typical of modern syrah or shiraz. Ask Gentaz, Verset, Juge or Chol about beefiness!!! You won't be disappointed!

IMHO, I am not sure you are looking in the good direction if you want extraction power and beefiness in your northern rhone. You may have much better chances in southern climates.

Amicalement

Eric
posted by Brézème 08-02-10 9:10am
 
We can all feel humbled, but I still stand by my assertion that 80's Guigal were not bad introductions to Norther Rhone syrah. I know it's fashionable to like the small producers, but the oak was not present and racheted up like later in the '90's.
 
I think supporting (not necessarily liking) small producers merits an adjective way more important than fashionable. Does one prefer to support a family working and living on a small farm or help a CEO buy a home in Aspen or a corporate jet? My particular brand of savage capitalism is definitely biased towards the little guy.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
I think supporting (not necessarily liking) small producers merits an adjective way more important than fashionable. Does one prefer to support a family working and living on a small farm or help a CEO buy a home in Aspen or a corporate jet? My particular brand of savage capitalism is definitely biased towards the little guy.

I'm all for supporting smallness, but truth is, the availability (not to mention sheer numbers) of producers of Cote Rotie in the 1980's United States was not that great. I think you could find about 5-6 that were readily available. In most shops, you had Guigal and Jaboulet for Northern Rhone. Sometimes you would find Chave or Jasmin but that was about it. This is going back 30 years - I'm not talking about now when everything is a monkey-click away from satisfaction and there are 20-30 choices for these same appelations. Many more individuals bottling their own juice and also being imported, and this is an important difference that is being ignored by all the fashionistas out there.
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
Back in 2010 my idea of what northern Rhône syrah ought to be was still molded by the many Brune & Blondes and several LaLas I had drunk in the previous decade. In his search for Parker points, Guigal changed the perception of an appellation in the minds of the point seekers (like me) who didn't know better. So, even if his wines from the 80s are more in tune with "our" palate, or other vintages have absorbed their repugnantly abundant nfo, I don't want to support someone who I see as a suit-wearing money-grubbing big-time producer with a corny technological winery who distorted the perception of an appellation. But I won't contest charges that I should be punishing myself instead of him.

As for my old syrah paradigm, Eric usefully scolded me on two occasions in 2010:

From me:
2007 Pierre Gonon Saint-Joseph 13.0%
According to the Chambers Street write-up, Gonon is included by John Livingstone-Learmonth, "the foremost writer on the Northern Rhone," in his STGT group - Soil to Glass Transfer, "along with Clape, Chave, Balthazar, Barge and a few others." Uncorked ninety minutes before dinner, the bottleneck was so mute that it immediately joined the STDG group - Soil to Decanter Transfer. At show time the genie was still fast asleep, but into the glass it went, venting its annoyance in the form of tar and rubber exhalations, shouting down the timid supporting cast of cherry and cloves. Luckily the mouth brought compensatory pleasures: fine acidity, good weight, and good acid/sweet balance. The tannins, however, are a bit too light. Where's the grip? Where are your gonads, Gonon? With cheese, a strange chemical note appears, like naphtalene or Baygon, but disappears after ten minutes, right before this was about to join the Soil to Sink Transfer group. Not one to harbor a grudge, I let Baygons be bygones and enjoy the rest of the bottle because it begins to hit it stride, bringing more cherry fruit to the fore and a late note of leafy eucalyptus. All in all, a curious experience, showing how past virtues - lack of wood or supermaturity - are no guarantee of future performance. Unless, of course, the future comes later.

Oswaldo Costa at 02-03-10 5:17am [edit]

From Eric:
Really, no one can think of waiting a little more than 2 weeks before drinking an old school northern rhone syrah?

A lot of 85s were not very tannic, extracted, high alcohol wines. Juge, gentaz or verset were in fact very delicate wines from the begining. They drank ok during the few monthes following the bottling, and then began to show that weird phase very typical of whole cluster syrahs. But for the past 15 years they have been a real joy to drink, and therefore I drank a lot.

Believe it or not, "Natural" syrah boys don't produce old school syrahs.
Their style is in fact very recent and modern according to my tasting history of Northern rhone wines.

I don't think it is a very good idea to consider the wines from gonon as a carbonic fruit salad. BTW we had a 1995 with David L. with Jean Gonon at their place a few days ago. I bet it tasted mutted 12 years ago, and that a lot of early stage syrah drinkers had to go for an Overnoy at that time. But today, no need to go for Jura. This one was plenty satisfying...

From me:
A Côte Rôtie in St. Joseph's Clothing
2004 Patrick Jasmin Côte Rôtie 12.5%
Blackberry, a bit of funk, and a hint of oak vanilla. Good acidity and balance, very enjoyable in an unpretentious vein. My only gripe has to do with my expectations more than the wine. Côte Rôtie has an associated gravitas that this doesn't deliver, being closer to fresh and light, perhaps more like a St. Joseph. Here, I would want more extraction, more weight, I don't know, more balls. Where's the beefiness?

From Eric:
I hope I am not being rude, but why do you want your northern rhone wines to have a chateauneuf structure?

Northern rhone is a cool area (more like beaujolais, than mediteranean like southern rhone in terms of climate) and wines tend to be on the light side unless one uses all the modern winemaking tricks in order to get extracted wines.

Beefiness for Côte Rotie? But traditionnal Cote Rotie is all about minerality violet and iodine. Beefiness is typical of modern syrah or shiraz. Ask Gentaz, Verset, Juge or Chol about beefiness!!! You won't be disappointed!

IMHO, I am not sure you are looking in the good direction if you want extraction power and beefiness in your northern rhone. You may have much better chances in southern climates.

Amicalement

Eric
posted by Brézème 08-02-10 9:10am

I believe this can all be summed up: obey the Rule.
 
I totally agree with MarkS about the Guigal Brune et Blonde from the 80s.
Even some Lalas were good to great (81) wines back then, despite the oak treatment.
1991 is the last vintage that one can consider as representative of the terroir, IMO.
 
Sorry to go against the grain here, but we had the E Guigal Chateauneuf du Pape Blanc '14 tonight and were well pleased -- quite aromatic, lively/lovely profile, full, round, ample core of fruit, integrated oaken notes, long, some lustiness, at a good place now but no hurry, really went well with grilled crab cakes and lentil/avocado/red onion/etc. salad.

. . . . Pete
 
originally posted by Peter Creasey:

Sorry to go against the grain here, but we had the E Guigal Chateauneuf du Pape Blanc '14 tonight and were well pleased -- quite aromatic, lively/lovely profile, full, round, ample core of fruit, integrated oaken notes, long, some lustiness, at a good place now but no hurry, really went well with grilled crab cakes and lentil/avocado/red onion/etc. salad.
Cheer up, Pete. We've tolerated people with far worse quirks than liking Guigal oak bombs. And going against the grain is practically de rigeur.
 
Back
Top