2006 Voillot Briailles Caillerets, 2007 Briailles IdV

Rahsaan

Rahsaan
After visiting Voillot and Briailles last weekend, I have been in the mood to drink more of their wines.

The 2007 Chandon de Briailles Île des Vergelesses was a lovely taste of what initially drew me to the domaine. Bright crisp cherry Côte de Beaune fruit that is very fragrant and tightly focused in the 'typical' Briailles IdV way. It also shows some age with mellow and harmonious flavor and aromas notes, very attractive. But the slightly-rustic tannins are also there. I don't mind, because the overall package is fun and appeals to me. But I wonder what we will gain/lose if those slightly-rustic earthy tannins are no longer present in the new wines.

The tête-à-tête was the 2006 Chandon de Briailles Volnay Caillerets and the 2006 Voillot Volnay Caillerets. The Briailles was easier to drink at first because it showed a fuller body early on, and has a very lovely structure of solid polished wine, elegant acids and tannins, and pretty good length. The big detraction is the murky fruit on the palate. Those stems? Alone it might be less of an issue.

But sitting right next to the gorgeous Voillot it was tough. After a bit of air, the bright juicy clear chiseled crystal Voillot was so damned gorgeous. Leans much more on fruit aromas than the Briailles, but is far from a frooty wine. Give me more!
 
I'm finding my 06 red Burgundies to be sterner, in general, than I'd expected; the ones that have opened a crack, however, are promising. My personal schedule still has them on 'hold' for a couple of years.
 
Far be it from me to opine on the state of 06 red Burgundy in general.

A few years ago I was having awkward bottles but this is my second bottle of 06 Voillot Caillerets in the past year and both were gorgeous.
 
Hm. I stepped backwards into a small quantity of 05 Voillot Champans a couple of years ago. But these, I imagine, would take more time to break their tannin symmetry, so to speak.
 
Yes, I had some 05 Voillot Champans a few years ago and it was cranky so I thought much more time was needed. But I hardly track these wines closely.
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Thanks for the notice, both of you. I guess I'll hold 06 red burg some more.

And yet I had an irrationally gorgeous 06 lavieres briailles over the winter.

Perfectly confused now?
 
originally posted by Pavel Tchichikov:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Thanks for the notice, both of you. I guess I'll hold 06 red burg some more.

And yet I had an irrationally gorgeous 06 lavieres briailles over the winter.

Perfectly confused now?

I've had two beauties from M-G, Vosne and Clos Vougeot. I'm drinking while the gettin' is good.
 
Great to see all these positive Voillot notes. We've had the 2011 Champans on the list at Rue for a while and it shows really well. Also had the 2015 version at our most recent Vintage 59 dinner and it was awesome. Retail on that is probably around $100 though. In context, I find that to be good value.
 
originally posted by Pavel Tchichikov:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Thanks for the notice, both of you. I guess I'll hold 06 red burg some more.

And yet I had an irrationally gorgeous 06 lavieres briailles over the winter.

Perfectly confused now?

What I hear is that Lavieres has a rep for precocious ebullience, in the context of SlP 1er vineyards. I've only tasted one specimen, which was freshly closed-down, and have no clue whether the reputation is fairly earned.
 
originally posted by VLM:
Great to see all these positive Voillot notes. We've had the 2011 Champans on the list at Rue for a while and it shows really well.

Nice. I don't think I bought any/many 2011 red Burgundies but tasting a few on our trip it seems like it can be quite a useful vintage right now.
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by VLM:
Great to see all these positive Voillot notes. We've had the 2011 Champans on the list at Rue for a while and it shows really well.

Nice. I don't think I bought any/many 2011 red Burgundies but tasting a few on our trip it seems like it can be quite a useful vintage right now.

That's how I find it. I think you would really like the 2015. The Voillot style seems to harness the vintage really well. I'm almost talking myself into buying more...
 
I'm sure I would like it. FWIW I also thought he harnessed the 2016 style really well. Great depth of dense fruit but also crisp clarity.

Will see how much powder I have when I get back Stateside.
 
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Well, 2005 is the new 1996, in things Burgundy, qué no?

No. If any recent vintage is comparable to 1996, which is known for its acid profile, it is 2008. Not sure I can think of a vintage to compare to 2005. Certainly 1988 had the tannins ( note “had”) but not the depth of fruit.
 
originally posted by maureen: Not sure I can think of a vintage to compare to 2005.

Maureen, in the case of 2005 Burgundies, to the extent that vintages can in general be compared with one another, I have felt there are marked similarities with 1990 and 2015.

. . . . Pete
 
originally posted by maureen:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Well, 2005 is the new 1996, in things Burgundy, qué no?

No. If any recent vintage is comparable to 1996, which is known for its acid profile, it is 2008. Not sure I can think of a vintage to compare to 2005. Certainly 1988 had the tannins ( note “had”) but not the depth of fruit.

I was thinking in terms of expected wait until widespread maturity, but, naturally, defer to your welcome correction.
 
Back
Top