TN: 2017 Falkenstein Niedermenniger Herrenberg Riesling Spätlese feinherb #3

Jayson Cohen

Jayson Cohen
Following up the last Falkenstein thread with this new and improved Falkenstein thread, this equally limpid wine is very fine but in a rounder style than the intensely cut and driving 2016 version. At least I think that is a fair comparison. There is a conundrum. The label says this is AP#3. The cork is branded AP#15. I’m not sure what to make of that. I appeal to the Webers and Lars Carlsberg for answers should they happen to see this.

In any case sponti, lightly spearminty aromas dominate until Day 4 (3 full days open). Then like magic it emerges. The nose shifts to a dynamic tapestry of anise, caraway, quinine, and herbs, most reminiscent to my nose of François Cotat’s Chavignol Culs de Beaujeu. But the slate-grown mouth is entirely different than that Kimmeridgian cracker. Lime and Granny Smith, definitely rounder and less diamond precise than 2016, but perhaps better integrated for its age. Best served below cellar temperature. It has almost Spatlese feel for a feinherb. It’s good. Very good. And goes excellently with a homemade butter chicken.

[Points withheld on philosophical grounds.]
 
originally posted by Jayson Cohen:
TN: 2017 Falkenstein Niedermenniger Herrenberg Riesling Spätlese feinherb #3 It has almost Spatlese feel...

Would that be because it is a spätlese?
 
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
Love this wine. I think it usually needs a little more time than you gave it. The 2013 was great recently.

This was my “open young and try” bottle. I’m patient but I’m also slightly more enamoured in 2017 with the Kabinett AP12. I’ll try AP14 Spatlese next.
 
Another finely chiseled note, universally expressive of subjective excellence. Did the word sponti suggest itself spontaneously, or did you have to will it?
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
I post therefore I drinkAnother finely chiseled note, universally expressive of subjective excellence. Did the word sponti suggest itself spontaneously, or did you have to will it?
Not all words embody their meaning in their sound.
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
I post therefore I drinkAnother finely chiseled note, universally expressive of subjective excellence. Did the word sponti suggest itself spontaneously, or did you have to will it?
Not all words embody their meaning in their sound.

Does a sentence read and not spoken have a sound?
 
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
originally posted by Oswaldo Costa:
I post therefore I drinkAnother finely chiseled note, universally expressive of subjective excellence. Did the word sponti suggest itself spontaneously, or did you have to will it?
Not all words embody their meaning in their sound.

Does a sentence read and not spoken have a sound?

Indeterminate.
 
Back
Top