Impressions 11-17-18

Florida Jim

Florida Jim
Wine Impressions - 11-17-18

Whites:
2015 Onesta, Grenache Blanc Clay Station Vnyd. - reminds me of coastal Italian white wine; loaded with mineral/salty underpinnings and fresh white fruit flavors. Plenty of cut and good balance. Overachieving at $15.
2013 Cowan Cellars, Bel - mostly Sauvignon Blanc with about 20% skin-fermented Ribolla Gialla blended in; deep and rich but not flabby, honeyed fruit, stones and citrus. A wine that has only come into its own in the last two years.
2016 Louis Michel, Chablis Vaillons - nowhere near ready but showing clear, clean Chardonnay without oak and that distinctive signature of Chablis. Perfect with shrimp scampi but aging a couple years should be even better.
2014 Louis Michel, Chablis Montee de Tonnerre - about as good as this house and vineyard can produce. Beautiful in all aspects, perfect balance and great length. Astonishing wine. As good a young Chablis as I have had - grand cru level.
2012 Leo Steen, Chenin Blanc “The Steen” - from the Jurassic Park Vineyard in the Santa Ynez Valley. All sorts of fresh fruit, flinty/salty elements, crisp acids and some of the honeyed tones that come to Chenin with age. Truly engaging wine. Has the stuff to age.

Rose:
2015 Cowan Cellars Jack’s Rose - more clairet than Rose; dry, crisp but with plenty of flavor and good length. A lovely wine and it stood well with trout meunière for her and pizza with prosciutto with Fresno chilies for me.

Reds:
2013 Marcarini, Barolo Brunate - young, tannic, full flavored but lightweight in the mouth; a delight.
1985 Chateau Margaux (magnum) - fresh, medium bodied, not showing its 34 years, complex and flavorful. A charming example of Bordeaux but another data point that reminds me that my personal preferences do not start with Cabernet.
2013 Onesta, Cinsault Bechthold Vnyd. - smells sweet but drinks bone dry; structured, fruit filled, savory accents and almost no weight in the mouth. Near ethereal delivery that finishes long. At $25, a no-brainer. Great stuff.
1999 Robert Chevillon, NSG Les Cailles - bottle bouquet/aquarium nose; firm, structured palate with moderate weight and decent sustain. Something regal here but also a nose that does not entice. A wine of paradox . . . but if that ain’t Burgundy, what is? Does not encourage aging.
1999 Bruno Giacosa, Barolo Falletto - insecticide, prunes, some Nebbiolo scents and flavors in the background, thin in the mouth . . . and nothing I want more of - and did not improve over the evening. Bought on release from a reputable dealer, cellared by me until opening. Thoroughly unimpressive. (Even with pot roast, this is unacceptable.)
Day two: the insecticide nose is gone but the pruney flavors remain and the palate is disjointed and thin.
2014 Dirty and Rowdy, Petite Sirah - dark berry nose, fine grained mouth feel, structured, concentrated and intense; I’m not much of a PS guy but this is nicely done. 11.9 abv.
2011 Bouchard Pere et Fils, Le Corton - a slight bit of charred wood on an otherwise deep and attractive nose; deep and focused palate with a polished delivery that is intense, concentrated and complete. It’s isn’t terribly complex (yet) but it’s delicious.
Day two: the char on the nose is pretty much gone and red fruit tones have come to the mouth. A little less polished, I’d say; a little more rustic - more about grape (and tannin) than place, and definitely shorter on the finish.
2015 Cusumano, Nero D’Avola - straightforward Nero without overt wood or artifice and showing some complexity and typicity. $9.
2013 Piedrassasi, Syrah Sebastiano Vnyd. - simply the most impressive new world Syrah I’ve had. Precise balance, complex, meaty, sauvage, deep and compelling. Each sip more engaging than the last as it opens up over the course of the evening. Old World in style, New World fruit and all world glorious. Oh my!

Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim: Impressions 11-17-18 distinctive signature of Chablis.

Jim, good notes, as always.

Sorry if this is tedious. Is the "distinctive signature" something you personally assign to Chablis or is it widely perceived that way.

If you don't mind, please comment on how you describe the distinctive signature of Chablis.

. . . . . Pete
 
Personal to me.
Chardonnay raised on limestone, especially Kimmeridgean, seems to have great energy and depth while maintaining focus. Chablis seems the epitome of that.
But as usual, trying to describe something unique is more difficult than it seems.
Best, Jim
 
Jim, thus the reason for my taxing question to you. I couldn't think how I might explain your well-founded descriptive term so I decided to see how you might do so.

Thanks for responding.

. . . . Pete
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:

1999 Bruno Giacosa, Barolo Falletto - insecticide, prunes... thin in the mouth . ...Bought on release from a reputable dealer, cellared by me until opening.

Ouch. That is brutal.

I guess you win some/lose some.
 
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Florida Jim:

1999 Bruno Giacosa, Barolo Falletto - insecticide, prunes... thin in the mouth . ...Bought on release from a reputable dealer, cellared by me until opening.

Ouch. That is brutal.

I guess you win some/lose some.

I have had several bottles of this wine in my cellar (and still do). Over the years my impression as varied between above average to this one - none have lived up to the pedigree.
Perhaps, in this case, vintage matters.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Florida Jim:

1999 Bruno Giacosa, Barolo Falletto - insecticide, prunes... thin in the mouth . ...Bought on release from a reputable dealer, cellared by me until opening.

Ouch. That is brutal.

I guess you win some/lose some.

I have had several bottles of this wine in my cellar (and still do). Over the years my impression as varied between above average to this one - none have lived up to the pedigree.
Perhaps, in this case, vintage matters.
Best, Jim

For me, just the opposite. I've been fortunate to have had a number of these wines through various vintages and they're routinely some of the best wines I've ever had and '99 was an especially strong vintage for them. A shame you obviously had an off bottle.
 
Brad,
I’m starting to wonder if my palate is changing again.
I started out in the late ‘80’s loving big CA cabs.
Into the early ‘90’s, the bigger the better; oakbombs, you bet!
Late ‘90’s brought me into the old world and as far from oak and cab. as I could get.
These days it seems that older wines are less pleasing to me, that fruit is becoming more important and that complex wines with fruit but no wood are my favorite. Of course, being in CA plays some role in that and using CA fruit to make my own wines has, too.
But maybe it’s aging. At 71, the taste buds just can’t be the same as they were at 51, can they?
Wino evolution is hard to figure.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Brad,
I’m starting to wonder if my palate is changing again.
I started out in the late ‘80’s loving big CA cabs.
Into the early ‘90’s, the bigger the better; oakbombs, you bet!
Late ‘90’s brought me into the old world and as far from oak and cab. as I could get.
These days it seems that older wines are less pleasing to me, that fruit is becoming more important and that complex wines with fruit but no wood are my favorite. Of course, being in CA plays some role in that and using CA fruit to make my own wines has, too.
But maybe it’s aging. At 71, the taste buds just can’t be the same as they were at 51, can they?
Wino evolution is hard to figure.
Best, Jim

Perhaps nebbiolo from B&B is simply too big for you anymore? At 14-14.5% these are not small wines. Perhaps your taste buds have migrated to the dark side after years of having lower alcohol wines?
 
Jim, my numerous observations are that as people, including people with great palates and knowledge, reach senior status, they tend to gravitate one of two ways, about 50/50. They either start liking bigger, more in-your-face wines, including perhaps even Australian wines or they otherwise start preferring softer, more subtle wines.

I definitely have moved more toward the softer, more subtle wines but while still enjoying Rhones, Zins, and the like with certain food dishes.

. . . . . Pete
 
originally posted by Peter Creasey:

Jim, my numerous observations are that as people, including people with great palates and knowledge, reach senior status, they tend to gravitate one of two ways, about 50/50. They either start liking bigger, more in-your-face wines, including perhaps even Australian wines or they otherwise start preferring softer, more subtle wines.

I definitely have moved more toward the softer, more subtle wines but while still enjoying Rhones, Zins, and the like with certain food dishes.

. . . . . Pete

I'm definitely in neither camp. Having ascended to geezerhood (as Wavy Gravy liked to say), I have two competing issues that may well be irreconcilable: I like the effect of alcohol less and I like to drink wine more, particularly natural and very high acid wines (not a fan of soft). The only solution - for now - appears to shoot for 11 or 12% . . .
 
originally posted by Peter Creasey:

Jim, my numerous observations are that as people, including people with great palates and knowledge, reach senior status, they tend to gravitate one of two ways, about 50/50. They either start liking bigger, more in-your-face wines, including perhaps even Australian wines or they otherwise start preferring softer, more subtle wines.

. . . . . Pete

Huh, the older I get, the wider a range of wines I like. Maybe I'm just improving my lifestyle through lower standards. ;^]
 
I like the effect of alcohol less and I like to drink wine more...
Indeed, one of the benefits of low alcohol wines. I've often thought "wouldn't it be great if wine could taste just like this, but with 6-7% alcohol?" It's also one of the factors that's been steering me towards craft beer on-premise.
 
originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Florida Jim:

1999 Bruno Giacosa, Barolo Falletto - insecticide, prunes... thin in the mouth . ...Bought on release from a reputable dealer, cellared by me until opening.

Ouch. That is brutal.

I guess you win some/lose some.

I have had several bottles of this wine in my cellar (and still do). Over the years my impression as varied between above average to this one - none have lived up to the pedigree.
Perhaps, in this case, vintage matters.
Best, Jim

For me, just the opposite. I've been fortunate to have had a number of these wines through various vintages and they're routinely some of the best wines I've ever had and '99 was an especially strong vintage for them. A shame you obviously had an off bottle.

Based on other vintages of this wine, and 99s of other producers, my reaction is the same. But then again, I associate prunes with picking too late plus some cellar decisions; and insecticide is one of my markers for brett (the evil kind). Neither of those being bottle storage issues. Multiple bottlings from different casks?
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Personal to me.
Chardonnay raised on limestone, especially Kimmeridgean, seems to have great energy and depth while maintaining focus. Chablis seems the epitome of that.
But as usual, trying to describe something unique is more difficult than it seems.
Best, Jim.

Agree, good Chablis has a flavor that is very hard to describe, yet instantly recognizable when encountered. I end up just saying "Chablis-like" when I encounter it (not often) in other wines.
 
Back
Top