originally posted by Odd Rydland:
There were some strange things going on with the Duplessis Clos 2000.
I remember quite a few years ago some musty wood. That is definitely not the case now.
originally posted by Odd Rydland:
There were some strange things going on with the Duplessis Clos 2000.
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
I'm a big fan of Duplessis Les Clos, too. It fills in -- as best anything can -- for Raveneau. I'm able to purchase it at $65-$70, is that seen as too much?
originally posted by Jayson Cohen:
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
I'm a big fan of Duplessis Les Clos, too. It fills in -- as best anything can -- for Raveneau. I'm able to purchase it at $65-$70, is that seen as too much?
That’s not too bad. I’ve seen the PCs recently at $50-$60.
I think it’s just the overall price jumps hitting our decades-old sensibilities. Plus pile on the 25% tariff.
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
I'm a big fan of Duplessis Les Clos, too. It fills in -- as best anything can -- for Raveneau. I'm able to purchase it at $65-$70, is that seen as too much?
originally posted by Mike Evans:
I paid around $60 for Louis Michel’s 2017 Vaudesir and $35-40 for 2017 and 2018 Premier Crus from Duplessis, Louis Michel, and Moreau-Naudet.
Good to hear. I have liked the Defaix wines that I've had, though I think there are as many Defaix as there are Gros so I'm not sure whether it's a trend or just luck.originally posted by Odd Rydland:
A recent (3 days ago) bottle of Defaix Cote de Lechet 2005 confirmed my thrust in aging Chablis for a minimum of 15 years. Creamy and complex, yet with that distinct Chablis minerality and freshness.
I've had very good results with Dauvissat. I'm looking around for a substitute only because the pricing has really become intolerable.And my oxydation rate with mature Chablis has been less than 10%, probably significantly less, though Dauvissat, Duplessis and Fevre have all had vintages with some problems.
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by Mike Evans:
I paid around $60 for Louis Michel’s 2017 Vaudesir and $35-40 for 2017 and 2018 Premier Crus from Duplessis, Louis Michel, and Moreau-Naudet.
Those good prices, especially the Vaudesir - you have an in.
Best, jim
originally posted by mark e:
originally posted by Odd Rydland:
There were some strange things going on with the Duplessis Clos 2000.
I remember quite a few years ago some musty wood. That is definitely not the case now.
originally posted by Tristan Welles:
I'm a big fan of Duplessis Les Clos, too. It fills in -- as best anything can -- for Raveneau. I'm able to purchase it at $65-$70, is that seen as too much?
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
I've had very good results with Dauvissat. I'm looking around for a substitute only because the pricing has really become intolerable.
originally posted by Jim Hanlon:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
I've had very good results with Dauvissat. I'm looking around for a substitute only because the pricing has really become intolerable.
I recommend Laurent Tribut for a Dauvissat-like approach. They're cousins, but that of course doesn't necessarily translate to the glass. In this instance, I think it does. Tribut doesn't have the same terroirs as Dauvissat, but still makes very nice wines.
originally posted by Matt Latuchie:
originally posted by Jim Hanlon:
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
I've had very good results with Dauvissat. I'm looking around for a substitute only because the pricing has really become intolerable.
I recommend Laurent Tribut for a Dauvissat-like approach. They're cousins, but that of course doesn't necessarily translate to the glass. In this instance, I think it does. Tribut doesn't have the same terroirs as Dauvissat, but still makes very nice wines.
Agree Jim. With Dauvissat prices as they are, Tribut is a great way to scratch that itch.
on the debate about longevity, I've had good luck over the years. Lucked into a 1981 Dauvissat Sechet bottle a couple years ago and was floored by how regal it was.