Oswaldo Costa
Oswaldo Costa
originally posted by mark e:
originally posted by georg lauer:
There was also a small difference in palate flavor/sensation, and here the Riedel seemed to hold a slight edge. The lack of flare on the Zalto may mean that the liquid is propelled slightly further into the mouth so that it hits the tongue closer to the middle. The Riedel's flare may mean that the liquid hits closer to the tip of the tongue, increasing the sweetness attack, leading to a more complete experience.
That seems to me the biggest difference. In the Riedel the wine just flows gently over that lip/flare and then expands in your mouth.
Agree. And is much more pleasant to drink wine from. Contrary to your impression, O, the Zalto is much less fragile. I wash them in the dishwasher. Would never do that with the Riedel Sommelier Burgundy glass.
I broke a Zalto a few weeks ago just from tipping it on its side in the sink. The stem is also visibly thinner, and tapers, whereas the Riedel's stem has a constant width. The Riedel is also a heavier glass, and seems made of slightly thicker glass, hence my impression that it appears more robust.