My trip to the Marche Aux Vins and Burgundy

Jeff Grossman

Jeff Grossman
A friend and I went to the Marche Aux Vins in Ampuis (my first time!) and then spent a few days in Burgundy. We visited Dom. Fourrier, Mugneret, Burguet, d'Ardhuy, Dujac, Chandon de Briailles, and our favorite local Disorderly, Brezeme.

I have posted some pictures.

I have also posted my travelog and TNs here on WD, but I had to spoof the file extensions so let me tell you how to get them:click the linkdownload the filechange the extension (remove ".jpg")...and the resulting bunch of bits should open in your local document or spreadsheet program.

I want to thank a few people who helped me to get my head into the right place while planning the trip: Claude Kolm, Keith Levenberg, and Steve Plotnicki.

( I have made a feeble preview-ish effort to post all those words here but it didn't look right. If enough Disorderlies have trouble then I'll try again. But you're a clever bunch; I know you'll find a way. )
 
Not a bad trip.

While it was good for you that Chandon de Briailles had so much wine to sell, was that because they make a relatively large amount or is there just not enough demand for their gentle style? A shame either way.
 
Not a bad trip
It was exhausting, occasionally, but I enjoyed it a lot. Everyone was quite nice to us. Needed just a bit more sunlight.

While it was good for you that Chandon de Briailles had so much wine to sell, was that because they make a relatively large amount or is there just not enough demand for their gentle style? A shame either way.
The latter, I think.
 
You're making me jealous that I couldn't make it this year.

Great for you that they had wine for sale at Chandon de Brailles.
 
originally posted by Chris Coad:
I can't download anything, it just crashes my browser. Why are your notes saved as a JPEG?

Chris,

On a Mac, Ctrl-click on the link and select "Download linked file as..." Save the file and remove the .jpg extension. You should be able to open the file from there.
 
Ditto here; I apparently need an Office disc to install some necessary extension, and the nearest one of those (that I own) is two hours away.
 
They save fine. They open fine. But, they're both blank when they are done opening. I, too, am on a Mac. Maybe I need the same plug-in that Thor needs. It doesn't give me an error though.
 
Jeff,
FWIW, it worked exactly as you said on my PC using IE.
Most impressive, although I'm not sure I understand the comments about premox and how to stop it. Are they saying they avoid sulpher at the press?
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Lee Short:
You're making me jealous that I couldn't make it this year.

Great for you that they had wine for sale at Chandon de Brailles.
Stephane Ogier told us to work on you.

Consider your arm twisted. (This is just the beginning... you have other appendages...)
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:

Most impressive, although I'm not sure I understand the comments about premox and how to stop it. Are they saying they avoid sulpher at the press?
Your question isn't clear.

The two of them (Texier, Fourrier) said that they get a lot of oxygen into the juice so that the wine is, later, keepable with normal or less sulfur. Texier credits the monks, Fourrier credits a molecule. Neither one talked about sulfur at press time.
 
originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
originally posted by Florida Jim:

Most impressive, although I'm not sure I understand the comments about premox and how to stop it. Are they saying they avoid sulpher at the press?
Your question isn't clear.

The two of them (Texier, Fourrier) said that they get a lot of oxygen into the juice so that the wine is, later, keepable with normal or less sulfur. Texier credits the monks, Fourrier credits a molecule. Neither one talked about sulfur at press time.

Jeff,
My question is based on the fact that many winemakers add sulpher at the press to avoid excessive oxidation and, of course, for the antiseptic properties.
So I assume what these guys are doing is avoiding that addition and perhaps, using some technique to get more air into the juice at the time of press - say a delestage-like technique of some sort.
And so, it appears that an idea that is counter-intuitive is actually effective. Not a unique event in winemaking.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by lars makie:
They save fine. They open fine. But, they're both blank when they are done opening. I, too, am on a Mac. Maybe I need the same plug-in that Thor needs. It doesn't give me an error though.

I had a similar problem when I tried following the procedure that Jeff outlined in his post. An empty (0 bytes) file was downloaded. Explicitly saving the files via Ctrl-click worked on my Mac with both Safari and Firefox. A similar technique also worked on my Linux PC using Firefox, though that uses a right-click to pull up the menu that allows downloading.

I took Thor's comment about needing an Office disk as a problem with opening the downloaded files using Word or Excel rather than a browser problem, though I may well be wrong about that. I was able to open the files on my Linux machine using OpenOffice, an open source suite of programs that can handle Microsoft .doc and .xls formats. I did, however, lose Jeff's embedded comment about his rating scale in OpenOffice. Ah, the joys of cross-platform issues.
 
I took Thor's comment about needing an Office disk as a problem with opening the downloaded files using Word or Excel rather than a browser problem, though I may well be wrong about that.
No, you're right. It's looking for a conversion utility of some sort. I suspect it doesn't actually need the disc for the utility, but instead wants to check that I have a license, though I could be wrong about that.

Open Office is something I intend to switch to as soon as I can devote a little time to studying it.
 
The PDF loses the one-and-only cell comment, as Steve reported, so here it is:

My rating scale for walkaround events began as a shorthand for whether to purchase, hence "+" for yes, "-" for no, and "o" for maybe. If I encounter something that excites or disgusts me, I will put more + or - on it, up to three.

I don't recall when I started to use "(x)" to indicate "nearly x". Anyway, in the moment the shorthand works for me, but I will render it into simple numerics because no one else can follow this arcana. (Even I am unlikely to be able to follow it in a few months....)

Thus, the table of translations (no "--" or "---" this time):

      - as -1
      o     0
    (+)     0.5
      +     1
   (++)     1.5
     ++     2
  (+++)     2.5
    +++     3
 
Back
Top