folks leap on the 04 green burg shit because there's a flavor component they can find in it.
ta da!!!
holy fuck. something they can agree on. like they is experts or somefink. boners all round.
trouble is, once they has picked out their progress, they can't ignore it.
remember being six and worrying that if you stopped thinking about breathing you'd die?
retards.
if you ever get beyond square plugs in moist holes, you'll find identifiable (aka don't miss the fucking barn door, this-is-what-is-in-your-mouth) characteristics in a whole bunch of shitty burgundy vintages: 76, 79, 80, 83, 86, 87, 88, 91, 93, 95, 98, 01 (it's there, i'm sure, in bullshit like 89, 90, 97 and 03, but i don't hate myself enough to find out). bottom line is there's a shit load of stuff out there to hate if you want to be told what to hate.
and then there's all that acid, flab and cruddy blocky tannins in the vintages you were told to like but lacked the tell tale signature. yeah, you know. the ones you thought were safe. nuh uh. does that make it better?
as a fruit lover, i think it's funny how the same folks that despise the green in 04s shit their livers for 05s and don't notice all that acid that is going make to them crave crushed ladybugs and menthol smokes for the next 20 odd years.
wait? you wanted to *drink* em before that? too fucking bad.
fwiw, i had some fucked up 01 shit from arnoux tonight. awful. obvious 01 cabbage, plus medicine and stink from old vines and pinot fin.
i'm like, "what the fuck is with the vegetarian shit motherfuckers," - gimme some santa maria cola ripeness and fat to rub on my corpulent ass.
and then the meds kicked in.
so. as per the cwd, foillard and lapierre age fine. like the shit. ask others why i say so.
fb.