originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by slaton:
I think Occam's Chainsaw would probably get the job done.
+4 Vorpal blade.
snicker
snack
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by slaton:
I think Occam's Chainsaw would probably get the job done.
+4 Vorpal blade.
snicker
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by MarkS:
Ferraton, Hermitage, 'les Miaux', 1998
Whatever happened to these vignerons? I never see them around anymore. Translucent dried maroon red color. Cherry straw and iron on the nose. Rusty iron, beet skin, sour cherry-redcurrant juice, with noticeable tannins remaining. This is probably toward peak now, having the middle-aged spirit of fighting a vision of future death, but balancing the tension between smooth fruit and loss of such. In a good spot. B+
Bought by Chapoutier or Terlato or some such and used mainly as a negiociant arm.
I've had some great bottles of Ferraton in the past, too bad.
originally posted by Brad L i l j e q u i s t:
Parker et al don't want to talk about this because it makes their decisive/declarative notes and scoring meaningless.
.
I don't know Mark but I think it's a fair assumption he has a good palate. The wine he described is nothing like the wine I had Friday night. My wine was vibrant and has years left in it. Applying Ockham's Razor, or some form of it, the deduction I make is that there's problems with the bottle he had.
originally posted by SFJoe:
JLL might be accused of being a bit broad minded.
I find, though, that you have to read what he doesn't say on a subject along with what he does say. That description of TL (which squares with my limited experience) tells me what I need to know.
originally posted by Yixin:
I don't know Mark but I think it's a fair assumption he has a good palate. The wine he described is nothing like the wine I had Friday night. My wine was vibrant and has years left in it. Applying Ockham's Razor, or some form of it, the deduction I make is that there's problems with the bottle he had.
Or perhaps your taste is fucked up? Mark has good palate, bottles sound different, ergo Steve has a shit palate. Same razor, different cut.
Yah, no way he'd fit in around here.originally posted by Brad L i l j e q u i s t:
As we've said before, he's very discreet, in a nice English way.
originally posted by SFJoe:
Yah, no way he'd fit in around here.originally posted by Brad L i l j e q u i s t:
As we've said before, he's very discreet, in a nice English way.
originally posted by SteveTimko:
originally posted by Yixin:
I don't know Mark but I think it's a fair assumption he has a good palate. The wine he described is nothing like the wine I had Friday night. My wine was vibrant and has years left in it. Applying Ockham's Razor, or some form of it, the deduction I make is that there's problems with the bottle he had.
Or perhaps your taste is fucked up? Mark has good palate, bottles sound different, ergo Steve has a shit palate. Same razor, different cut.
Perhaps Yixin is fucked up? Because Yixin probably can't tell the difference between a fading wine and one with years left and assumes others can't either?
... Still, certainly modern, even given the plush vintage. Blind I might have guessed Australian...