originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by Yixin:
I thought the recent LMHBs excellent, not that I can afford to buy any.
The 1995 is a stunner.
I wouldn't go that far. It's certainly lovely and I'd drink a full glass or two if opened, but I don't think it reaches the heights of say the '88, which ,of course is not the stunner that say '89 is. Now the '89, that's stunning. Nay, profound.
I've actually followed the progess of the '89 over the course of the last 10 years, having checked in roughly about 20 times. And I disagree with what you have concluded here. I liked it much better several years ago. For me, neither the '89 Haut-Brion or the '89 La Mission Haut Brion are quite deserving of the accolades that they have received. In both cases I would prefer a vintage from the mid-90's ('96 HB, for instance) at this time, actually.
But then we have disagreed in the past about what consitutes a stunning wine, so perhaps this whole bit is not so surprising.
At the end of the day, the whole which-is-more-perfect-game is pretty pointless, though. Except that points are involved.