originally posted by Thor:Because you're working with a pretty thin folio of evidence.
How do you know this?
originally posted by Thor:Because you're working with a pretty thin folio of evidence.
originally posted by Rahsaan:
originally posted by Thor:Because you're working with a pretty thin folio of evidence.
How do you know this?
Because you keep telling us by what you say.How do you know this?
originally posted by Thor:
No, you're not. It's a little difficult to take what you're saying as particularly useful until you have more experience with the wines. Because you're working with a pretty thin folio of evidence.I'm no expert
If only.originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Is there a threshold of expertise chat participants have to cross before they're authorized to post?
Thanks.originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
Nice snark, masked politburo man!
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
man
originally posted by Thor:
I love how skin contact is now an extreme winemaking technique.extreme winemaking techniques
No, but if you're going to assert strong opinions about categories (vintage generalizations, orange wine generalizations, Burgundy generalizations), you should be prepared to bring and deliver the problem sets, showing the work. "Gosh...gee...aren't orange wines sorta, you know, the same?" doesn't cut it.oWith due respect, I can't make sense of this response. Is there a threshold of expertise chat participants have to cross before they're authorized to post? Where's the entrance exam?
While passive-aggressiveness is cute and you're just adorable, bless your heart, the point is that extended skin contact isn't an extreme technique. Your claim is that because it's unusual for whites, it's extreme. It's not. It's unexpected for whites, but it's not an extreme or terroir-destroying technique for reds, so I really think the onus is on you to describe why it would be so for whites.For wines made from white grapes, extended skin contact is pretty extreme or would you say that you can't tell the difference?
originally posted by Thor:
No, but if you're going to assert strong opinions about categories (vintage generalizations, orange wine generalizations, Burgundy generalizations), you should be prepared to bring and deliver the problem sets, showing the work. "Gosh...gee...aren't orange wines sorta, you know, the same?" doesn't cut it.oWith due respect, I can't make sense of this response. Is there a threshold of expertise chat participants have to cross before they're authorized to post? Where's the entrance exam?
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
man
Ha ha ha.
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by Sharon Bowman:
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
man
Ha ha ha.
Sorry, was that you, Sharon? No disrespect intended.
originally posted by Yule Kim:
I thought there were no women posters on Wine Disorder. I thought everyone here was Michel Rolland sock puppets, including me.
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons: I guess I didn't take Rahsaan's comments quite this way; but then I'm in the hack-amateur camp myself. Plus, I've had dinner with him over wine, which tends to soften attitudes..