Florida Jim
Florida Jim
originally posted by .sasha:
I wonder what Fourrier Sr would have done with this guy, had he visited.
Human sacrifice is still legal in Gevrey.
Best, Jim
originally posted by .sasha:
I wonder what Fourrier Sr would have done with this guy, had he visited.
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by .sasha:
I wonder what Fourrier Sr would have done with this guy, had he visited.
Human sacrifice is still legal in Gevrey.
Best, Jim
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
What is unclear to me is why he thinks this image is one that will sell anyone on him. I'm not being ironic. I truly don't get it. I get the one where he shows himself hobnobbing with vignerons in vineyards. But what's the attraction in clips where he says numbers?
It's a voodoo ritual. He is possessed of the god of points, and if you were a believer you could tell.
I think he is projecting his unshakable confidence that:
*Points really mean something
*He can assign them on the absolute scale
*If you listen to him, you can catch a contact high of his confidence and univariate scale and etc., and you needn't fear the mockery of your dinner guests when you pull out the expensive juice.
Something like that.
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
What is unclear to me is why he thinks this image is one that will sell anyone on him. I'm not being ironic. I truly don't get it.
Highly doubtful. As someone in film/video post-production, I find watching these videos painful; akin to bamboo shoots under my fingernails. I just can't imagine Suckling sitting there, capturing the footage into Final Cut (or most likely iMovie) and then putting it together, exporting it and uploading to his site/youtube. But, whomever is putting this together for him, needs to get better quickly. It's not even good-bad; like retro-cheesy. The supers at the front and the whole thing actually, look like he got a bad wedding videographer to do this for him. Epic fail.originally posted by Bwood:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
What is unclear to me is why he thinks this image is one that will sell anyone on him. I'm not being ironic. I truly don't get it.
Surely he didn't put this together himself, it must be someone editing video off footage off his website and then posting it on Youtube, right? I mean it's just not possible he edited this video himself. Right?
Not if you embody the points system.originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Isn't it an odd diction -- "I'm xx points on that." ?
originally posted by .sasha:
I wonder what Fourrier Sr would have done with this guy, had he visited.
To be a fly on that wall . . .originally posted by Arno Tronche:
I think Suckling should hire Nossiter.
Yes, that's my feeling. You just have to feel the cosmic vibrations. He's a medium.originally posted by nigel groundwater:
Not if you embody the points system.originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Isn't it an odd diction -- "I'm xx points on that." ?
originally posted by SFJoe:
Yes, that's my feeling. You just have to feel the cosmic vibrations. He's a medium.originally posted by nigel groundwater:
Not if you embody the points system.originally posted by Jeff Grossman:
Isn't it an odd diction -- "I'm xx points on that." ?
originally posted by lars makie:
Highly doubtful. As someone in film/video post-production, I find watching these videos painful; akin to bamboo shoots under my fingernails. I just can't imagine Suckling sitting there, capturing the footage into Final Cut (or most likely iMovie) and then putting it together, exporting it and uploading to his site/youtube. But, whomever is putting this together for him, needs to get better quickly. It's not even good-bad; like retro-cheesy. The supers at the front and the whole thing actually, look like he got a bad wedding videographer to do this for him. Epic fail.originally posted by Bwood:
originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
What is unclear to me is why he thinks this image is one that will sell anyone on him. I'm not being ironic. I truly don't get it.
Surely he didn't put this together himself, it must be someone editing video off footage off his website and then posting it on Youtube, right? I mean it's just not possible he edited this video himself. Right?
No, it is his official video, posted by him (or the official screen name for his web site, anyway). Amazing.originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
The suggestion that someone else did this to his video and put it on YouTube make sense to me. None of the imaginings here make me think a film of someone saying numbers would make him an attractive option as a critic for anyone, including the various bogeymen whose existence people project.
originally posted by Keith Levenberg:
No, it is his official video, posted by him (or the official screen name for his web site, anyway). Amazing.originally posted by Jonathan Loesberg:
The suggestion that someone else did this to his video and put it on YouTube make sense to me. None of the imaginings here make me think a film of someone saying numbers would make him an attractive option as a critic for anyone, including the various bogeymen whose existence people project.
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
The poor man's left his safe harbor and is trying to make a living doing what he's done for the last umpteen years.