Beaujolais, whether good, bad, young, or old, and whether wooded or not, never tastes like pinot noir from parts northward in France. Well, maybe on rare occasion when the wine comes from the very south of the Beaujolais, but even that tastes more like Côtes d'Or gamay than like pinot noir. Beaujolais may sometimes taste like Germany and Swiss pinot noir, but not like Burgundy. Not even if the wine was vinified with yeast intended to produce aromas like Burgundy and the wine was raised in barrels like they favor in Burgundy.
This isn't about quality. The wines just taste, smell, age, and usually even look different. A great Beaujolais is a great wine whether or not its aged character suggests Burgundy or anything else. And a bad one that manages to taste to Kane like Burgundy is still bad, whether or not anyone else tastes "dead leaves" in it.
The old cliché about this or that example being one that should "pinot" with age just intends to suggest the wines do age, and that they will get closer in general character to the more famous wines from near by, as older red wines of similar general shape will tend to do.
About 2009, some of the wines are good, some not, so far as I've seen. Imagine that.
With all the progress in wine geekdom, the horrid marketing crap regarding vintage continues to possess popular imagination. I suppose my work isn't yet all done. Fads come and go but horse shit never dies.