Claude Kolm
Claude Kolm
Actually, I don't recall anyone in Germany six weeks ago telling me that they had only a few grams of sugar in their trocken Riesling. They were at least at 5g (not even sure I can recall anyone that low) and most up around 7-9 g/l.originally posted by David M. Bueker:
The issue with dry German Riesling is the same one for off-dry German Riesling. We must talk about three things: producer, producer, producer (sounds like Burgundy).
There's an ocean of crap on both sides of the sugar spectrum, but indeed the top trockens are great dry wines. Of course not all of them are actually dry. There's that 0-9 g/l range for residual sugar that leaves quite a lot of freedom in terms of how the final wine expresses itself. Just taste some of hte dry wines from Jonannes Leitz. That little bit (usually around 7-8 g/l) of sugar gives them the push from good but stern to delicious and drinkable. I'm sure (in my own mind...betting on it in my cellar) it will also help them age even better than some of the bone dry examples of German Riesling Trocken.
I do like Johannes Leitz's approach to trockens. If it ferments dry then fine, it can be dry, but if it doesn't he does not force it. So it's not like taking the sugar out of a perfectly good off-dry wine (hmmm, Kane wrong?), but rather letting the wine be what it wants to be. At least that's how Johannes says it goes for his top dry wines (e.g. Rottland Alte Reben).