Ian Fitzsimmons
Ian Fitzsimmons
Exposure alone doesn't seem enough to explain the difference between, say, a Montee de Tonnerre and a Chassagne Clos St. Jean.
That seems an extreme position.originally posted by Oliver McCrum:
The current state of play scientifically appears to be (not having had time to listen to the podcast yet) that effects of soil are limited to drainage and the presence of the obvious main nutrients.
originally posted by MarkS:
My new Vulture producer, in fact, was once told by an American importer that her wines weren't oaky enough.
Like we Need more 'cuvee uniques'??
originally posted by SFJoe:
That seems an extreme position.originally posted by Oliver McCrum:
The current state of play scientifically appears to be (not having had time to listen to the podcast yet) that effects of soil are limited to drainage and the presence of the obvious main nutrients.
I wonder, for instance, whether soil effects are not also mediated through mycorrhizal populations, which doubtless have pH and trace element preferences.
It's a subject that has only recently become reasonable to study.
Could someone be enough of a blockhead to doubt limestone, for instance?originally posted by Oliver McCrum:
I am approaching this from the other perspective, which is that certain soils tend to be associated with certain flavors even if other factors vary, and a reasonable person has to wonder whether the soil is somehow creating those flavors.
Ouch! Oliver, I CERTAINLY was not implying that you might import such wines; I had no idea you were only using your own imports, and don't forget, we share import privileges of that Vulture producer, Grifalco, so for me to suggest your aglianico is oaky or point-chasing would be quite ridiculous!originally posted by Oliver McCrum:
Chaad,
I don't import wines that are oaky or point-chasing, so there won't be a problem.
My new Vulture producer, in fact, was once told by an American importer that her wines weren't oaky enough.
originally posted by SFJoe:
Could someone be enough of a blockhead to doubt limestone, for instance?originally posted by Oliver McCrum:
I am approaching this from the other perspective, which is that certain soils tend to be associated with certain flavors even if other factors vary, and a reasonable person has to wonder whether the soil is somehow creating those flavors.
Yes, but. Wait. What?originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by SFJoe:
Could someone be enough of a blockhead to doubt limestone, for instance?
So you saw The Trip, then?
originally posted by slaton:
Yes, but. Wait. What?originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by SFJoe:
Could someone be enough of a blockhead to doubt limestone, for instance?
So you saw The Trip, then?
originally posted by chaad thomas:
Ouch! Oliver, I CERTAINLY was not implying that you might import such wines; I had no idea you were only using your own imports, and don't forget, we share import privileges of that Vulture producer, Grifalco, so for me to suggest your aglianico is oaky or point-chasing would be quite ridiculous!originally posted by Oliver McCrum:
Chaad,
I don't import wines that are oaky or point-chasing, so there won't be a problem.
My new Vulture producer, in fact, was once told by an American importer that her wines weren't oaky enough.
With regards to soil, I'd take a look at how vitric the subsoils are in the volcanic regions, and check for correlation to quality there. I'd suspect that vigorous, deeper rooting rootstocks (e.g. 110R or 1103P such as are used for aglianico) might fare better in those environments.
Does any of that correlate to pinot noir grown in Oregon, on the volcanic Jory soil there? I dunno.
originally posted by SFJoe:
Could someone be enough of a blockhead to doubt limestone, for instance?originally posted by Oliver McCrum:
I am approaching this from the other perspective, which is that certain soils tend to be associated with certain flavors even if other factors vary, and a reasonable person has to wonder whether the soil is somehow creating those flavors.
Identifying the phenomenon is different from understanding the mechanism, and it would be nice to have both sewn up, but this seems willfully obtuse, or maybe these guys never taste good wine. And "scientifically impossible" is a very bold statement to make about a subject where you have admittedly incomplete understanding.originally posted by Oliver McCrum:
'A direct geochemical influence on wine flavour is widely inferred but remains undemonstrated...The notion of being able to taste the vineyard geology in the wine...is a romantic notion...wholly anecdotal...scientifically impossible.'
'originally posted by SFJoe:
Identifying the phenomenon is different from understanding the mechanism, and it would be nice to have both sewn up, but this seems willfully obtuse, or maybe these guys never taste good wine. And "scientifically impossible" is a very bold statement to make about a subject where you have admittedly incomplete understanding.
My occasional forays into the literature suggest that wine chemistry does not always attract talent of, say, the Lipton caliber.