Latest Marcassin mailer

originally posted by Steve Edmunds:
I am so much reminded of the tea party in Alice in Wonderland!
It was that intelligible to you? I admire your ability to postulate anything from the preceding posts.
 
A small aside . . .

Parker calls the Marcassin wines "prodigious."

Prodigious means:
1. Remarkably or impressively great in extent, size, or degree.
2. Unnatural or abnormal.

Best, Jim
 
I would like to know why the quote places all the "intellectually, both are brilliant, and as well informed about viticulture in all its ramifications" folks here in the US? I guess those Italians, German and French really are stupid, huh? (To say nothing of the Spanish!)
 
originally posted by mlawton:
I would like to know why the quote places all the "intellectually, both are brilliant, and as well informed about viticulture in all its ramifications" folks here in the US? I guess those Italians, German and French really are stupid, huh? (To say nothing of the Spanish!)
Maybe he only knows Americans.
Which, thinking about it, answers some questions I've had.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
A small aside . . .

Parker calls the Marcassin wines "prodigious."

Prodigious means:
1. Remarkably or impressively great in extent, size, or degree.
2. Unnatural or abnormal.

Best, Jim

But you know that Parker neither meant nor was even thinking of meaning 2. He is a sloppy user of adjectives in any case, but in his world, big taste is good taste.
 
Jonathan,
Agreed.
But I just love number 2.

On a strictly personal level, I have little real quarrel with Parker and his pronouncements. Of course, I also don't read his stuff anymore (except for what gets posted on the boards) nor do I read any of the professional critics.
And I have an entirely different palate, so he would be the least relevant of any of the pros were I to start again.
But I am also aware of his background and his training in the use of language and I do have a quarrel with how he says things. I will never forget the time he called another wine critic's opinion stupid; a useage I will never understand or forgive.
Sloppy may be charitable when it comes to describing his writings.

It is easy to make an error with adjectives in face-to-face conversation and, I think, easier to clean-up the mess in such circumstances. But to have time to ponder what you write and still do it so poorly, that just galls.
Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
Jonathan,
Agreed.
But I just love number 2.

On a strictly personal level, I have little real quarrel with Parker and his pronouncements. Of course, I also don't read his stuff anymore (except for what gets posted on the boards) nor do I read any of the professional critics.
And I have an entirely different palate, so he would be the least relevant of any of the pros were I to start again.
But I am also aware of his background and his training in the use of language and I do have a quarrel with how he says things. I will never forget the time he called another wine critic's opinion stupid; a useage I will never understand or forgive.
Sloppy may be charitable when it comes to describing his writings.

It is easy to make an error with adjectives in face-to-face conversation and, I think, easier to clean-up the mess in such circumstances. But to have time to ponder what you write and still do it so poorly, that just galls.
Best, Jim

I agree with just about everything you say here. Where's the fun it that?

Well except that Parker likes some of the same Southern Rhone wines that I do.
 
Could...someone...explain...the ellipses...to me?

As a chef friend says about dumb food combinations, "nobody's doin' that!" Where did it come from, why does he do it?
 
Joe,
No idea.
Although, I have always thought them a device for delivering a sort of stream of consciousness message.
Best, Jim
 
Isn't ellipse abuse very common in contemporary informal communication? It takes away the pressure to construct a whole sentence/thought.
 
Back
Top