Need SF dinner recommendations

  • Thread starter Thread starter BJ
  • Start date Start date
Heirloom Cafe has a very nice prix fixe deal and a very decent by-the-glass list. Excellent food; I think they're doing the coffee-braised lamb again which is a dish I could eat every night for a year. Bonus is that you can usually get a seat without too much effort, and you can probably make reservations without starting three months in advance. They have a fairly short menu and it doesn't change as frequently as other places in the city, but the food is more than comparable to places like NOPA or Frances.

Speaking of which you could always give Frances a try, even without reservations. They have a small bar area for walk-ins; the trick is to go in right around the first turn (maybe 6ish) when the earliest early-birds are just finishing up. You might have to wait 10-15 minutes but the food is worth the attempt. If you do make it in go for the appetizers, salads, and small side dishes - everything else is excellent, but the aforementioned stuff is nearly always spectacular.
 
originally posted by maureen:
and while we're praising Zuni Cafe, may I just observe that the Zuni Cafe cookbook is terrific?

couldn't agree more. i use the cookbook a lot. roast chicken and old tempier rouge in october was sublime.
 
originally posted by Carl Steefel:
originally posted by BJ:
Need SF dinner recommendationsDid this a couple years ago. Need recs for nice dinner, homey, good wine list. Down for a quick weekend. Thanks.

Will be checking out Zuni Cafe again tonight after not having been there for years. Tough decision between the 2009 Lapierre Morgon "N" or the 2010 Huet le Mont Sec (the 2005 Huet Petillant just sold out). They also have the Puzelat Tue-Boeuf on the list.

As of last Monday at least, Zuni has the '02 Huet Pet. reserve. Drinking very well (no surprise). The 2010 Lapierre N was good, but i didn't swoon. Really excellent with their burger though.

BJ, Cotogna is very nice. I think you and Mde L would like it; you'll want to ask for the Quince wine list though. (Also, i know you said dinner, but Cotogna is also really lovely for lunch, particularly if it is warm enough to eat at one of the 3 or 4 sidewalk tables; and a lot easier to score a resi for lunch. The pastas and the pizzas are really excellent.

I think the food at Incanto is excellent, but I hated the wine list. Maybe BYO from Terroir?

Not surprisingly, I think Levi is right on about Nopa v. Nopalito. No wine list to speak of at Nopalito but beers are OK or again a BYO option.
 
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by John Donaghue:

Speaking of which you could always give Frances a try, even without reservations.

Paul Einbund is awesome.

Paul may be good, but he's not in the kitchen. This is the most over-rated restaurant in San Francisco for me. Been there three times and still waiting for my first exceptional meal.
 
originally posted by BJ:
Need SF dinner recommendationsDid this a couple years ago. Need recs for nice dinner, homey, good wine list. Down for a quick weekend. Thanks.

I've been lobbying for food from the Spencer truck + Terroir, but Mme L will have none of it. She wants a proper sit down.

Don't forget Oliveto in Oakland, right across from the BART station in Rockridge. Really exceptional pasta, their own salume, and great roasted secondi. Very nice wine list and super sweet, smart, spoof-free service.
 
I know a sometimes restaurant reviewer for the NYT who said to me that his recent meal at Bar Tartine was one of his most exciting in some time. I haven't been, myself.
 
originally posted by kirk wallace:
originally posted by BJ:
Need SF dinner recommendationsDid this a couple years ago. Need recs for nice dinner, homey, good wine list. Down for a quick weekend. Thanks.

I've been lobbying for food from the Spencer truck + Terroir, but Mme L will have none of it. She wants a proper sit down.

Don't forget Oliveto in Oakland, right across from the BART station in Rockridge. Really exceptional pasta, their own salume, and great roasted secondi. Very nice wine list and super sweet, smart, spoof-free service.
I have not been back recently, but the last visit upstairs provided a quite expensive meal of only slightly above average quality at Oliveto. Before that, it was the downstairs cafe where they brought out spoiled meat and reheated (dried out) pasta. Unless they have brought their game back up, I think one could find much better places than this (Flour + Water, etc).
 
originally posted by Jim Hanlon:
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by John Donaghue:

Speaking of which you could always give Frances a try, even without reservations.

Paul Einbund is awesome.

Paul may be good, but he's not in the kitchen. This is the most over-rated restaurant in San Francisco for me. Been there three times and still waiting for my first exceptional meal.

You've got more stamina for punishment than I, Jim. The one meal that I had was a disaster.
 
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
originally posted by Jim Hanlon:
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by John Donaghue:

Speaking of which you could always give Frances a try, even without reservations.

Paul Einbund is awesome.

Paul may be good, but he's not in the kitchen. This is the most over-rated restaurant in San Francisco for me. Been there three times and still waiting for my first exceptional meal.

You've got more stamina for punishment than I, Jim. The one meal that I had was a disaster.

Claude, I keep thinking there must be something to it, given generally positive reviews and immense popularity. I suspect that location has a big role. There's a lot of money for dining out in the Castro, and not a lot of high end restaurants. At least that's the best explanation I've come up with yet.
 
i'd actually be interested in the opinions of folks who know way more about this than i, but the vibe i got from people who have (and still do) run chow joints in the castro is that foodwise, it is largely a black hole. the folks who tend to hang in the castro have things other than teh chow on their minds, and the affluent gay dollars that one might expect -- based on stereotype -- to be there have better places to go and be.

comments?

fb.
 
originally posted by Jim Hanlon:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
originally posted by Jim Hanlon:
originally posted by Levi Dalton:
originally posted by John Donaghue:

Speaking of which you could always give Frances a try, even without reservations.

Paul Einbund is awesome.

Paul may be good, but he's not in the kitchen. This is the most over-rated restaurant in San Francisco for me. Been there three times and still waiting for my first exceptional meal.

You've got more stamina for punishment than I, Jim. The one meal that I had was a disaster.

Claude, I keep thinking there must be something to it, given generally positive reviews and immense popularity. I suspect that location has a big role. There's a lot of money for dining out in the Castro, and not a lot of high end restaurants. At least that's the best explanation I've come up with yet.

I know that one week after I went, a friend who is a prominent chef and his gf who also is professionally involved in food went, and they had a problematic experience, too. Some dishes good, others really bad. Terrible oversalting seems to be a problem, so there would seem to be control issues in the kitchen. Also, service is poor -- they don't leave your wine bottle at your table, which wouldn't be too bad if they noticed when you need a repour and responded, but they don't.

As for the fact that Frances has garnered a lot of praise, I can say the same for many other restaurants in SF that I consider poor, so that's not an argument that works for me.
 
originally posted by fatboy:
i'd actually be interested in the opinions of folks who know way more about this than i, but the vibe i got from people who have (and still do) run chow joints in the castro is that foodwise, is that it is largely a black hole. the folks who tend to hang in the castro have things other than teh chow on their minds, and the affluent gay dollars that one might expect -- based on stereotype -- to be there have better places to go and be.

comments?

fb.

I'm not sure that as a residential area (as opposed to a cultural/business district), the Castro is really that gay. If you include all of Noe Valley, I know plenty of straights in the area, and relatively few of the gays I know are there -- anecdotal, sure, but still . . . .

Right now, I get the impression that low rents are the driving force for location of new, ambitious restaurants in SF, not economic distribution of the surrounding area. Moreover, even it were, there are plenty of other interesting restaurants not far from the Castro.
 
originally posted by Claude Kolm:

I'm not sure that as a residential area (as opposed to a cultural/business district), the Castro is really that gay.

It wasn't 100%, but it was pretty darn queer when I lived there until 15 years ago.

My old rap on the place was that young Johnny Q. flees oppression in [small midwestern/southern town of choice], shows up in SF, moves to the Castro for solidarity and comfort, and brings his Sioux City palate with him. So the local places emphasized bland, boring food. Years later, newly filled wallet and husband in hand, he is a sophisticated San Franciscan foodwise, but he's moved to Pac Heights/SOMA/somewhere else with better food. And Johnny Q' has moved into his old apartment and is looking for fried chicken for dinner in the 'hood.

But the world, and doubtless the Castro, have changed a lot since then.
 
originally posted by SFJoe:

It wasn't 100%, but it was pretty darn queer when I lived there until 15 years ago.
YOu must remember the old Examiner ads, then -- A lot can change between 8 and 5. Well, I'd say even more can change between 1997 and 2012.

On his blog, Andrew Sullivan used to have a feature called "the end of gay culture," but he long ago gave it up because gays have become so accepted by and integrated into the mainstream. And of course, here more than anywhere.
 
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
Well, I'd say even more can change between 1997 and 2012.
Sure, and mostly for the better in this regard.

Except, as a guy I know said recently, for the major loss of fabulousness.
 
Back
Top