2004 d'Angerville?

originally posted by .sasha:
hold on a minute

This is d'Angerville we are talking about. Anyone try their 93s ... and spend weeks recovering from gustatory nihilism ? ...

Respect the wine, or in this case, fear the wine.

I had the 1993 Ducs not so long ago, and this pretty much captures it.
 
originally posted by David M. Bueker:
There will be other vintages. With lower prices.

Turns out only one of those statements was true.

Since if I read it correctly Joe was talking about the 2005 vintage both of them were true. '06s+ have come in well under the $280-$300 mentioned above.
 
originally posted by Cliff:
originally posted by .sasha:
hold on a minute

This is d'Angerville we are talking about. Anyone try their 93s ... and spend weeks recovering from gustatory nihilism ? ...

Respect the wine, or in this case, fear the wine.

I had the 1993 Ducs not so long ago, and this pretty much captures it.

Eh? Taillepieds last year was magnificent.
 
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by David M. Bueker:
There will be other vintages. With lower prices.

Turns out only one of those statements was true.

Since if I read it correctly Joe was talking about the 2005 vintage both of them were true. '06s+ have come in well under the $280-$300 mentioned above.

Lower than '05 yes - within reason - no. So I suppose both parts were true, but its a pyrrhic victory.
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by slaton:
2004 d'Angerville?I'm seeing '04 Clos des Ducs for less than 25% of the going price of the '05. How did d'Angerville do in '04? Gilman liked it, which has me curious.

I didn't like it and I don't really like 2004 Burgundy much.

It isn't the "green", it is an entirely different problem.

ok, way out of my league, but i am not convinced the two problems aren't connected
 
Back
Top