David M. Bueker
David M. Bueker
There will be other vintages. With lower prices.
Turns out only one of those statements was true.
There will be other vintages. With lower prices.
originally posted by .sasha:
hold on a minute
This is d'Angerville we are talking about. Anyone try their 93s ... and spend weeks recovering from gustatory nihilism ? ...
Respect the wine, or in this case, fear the wine.
originally posted by David M. Bueker:
There will be other vintages. With lower prices.
Turns out only one of those statements was true.
originally posted by Cliff:
originally posted by .sasha:
hold on a minute
This is d'Angerville we are talking about. Anyone try their 93s ... and spend weeks recovering from gustatory nihilism ? ...
Respect the wine, or in this case, fear the wine.
I had the 1993 Ducs not so long ago, and this pretty much captures it.
originally posted by Jay Miller:
originally posted by David M. Bueker:
There will be other vintages. With lower prices.
Turns out only one of those statements was true.
Since if I read it correctly Joe was talking about the 2005 vintage both of them were true. '06s+ have come in well under the $280-$300 mentioned above.
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by slaton:
2004 d'Angerville?I'm seeing '04 Clos des Ducs for less than 25% of the going price of the '05. How did d'Angerville do in '04? Gilman liked it, which has me curious.
I didn't like it and I don't really like 2004 Burgundy much.
It isn't the "green", it is an entirely different problem.