One fascinating thing about the nomenclature of the wines in the Remstal is that they take on one of two diametrically opposed forms. The consumer with a limited attention span for long Germanic words is only asked to remember a single letter, be it G (presumably from "Gutswein"), S (signifying Selection) or R (for Reserve); otherwise, the whole village/vineyard designation, while technically available, gives way to a characteristic description of the soil. I am not talking about lighthearted references to our favourite rocks, in the style of our beloved Vouvray producers (e.g. Argile vs Silex), but rather some hardcore local names for geological formations that define the respective parts of the hill. This becomes quite an adjustment when you realize you could be looking at wines from two different valleys that bear the same "terroir" name, and that you may have to do some digging to figure out where exactly the grapes come from. Such was the initial obstacle I had to overcome once His Corpulence and I were greeted by Jochen Beurer of Kernen, a most jovial fellow who possesses that wonderful quality of being able to provide just the level of information you request while also knowing when to let the wines do all the talking. Here we would expect to see Stettener Häder and Stettener Pulvermächer (Stetten being a hamlet just south of Kernen) as traditional names, but instead we get Gipskeupe, Schilfsandstein, Kieselsandstein and Stubensandstein (there'll be a quiz later). Conveniently, Jochen has glass cases full of rocks from these places, allowing for first hand inspection. Gipskeuper is small, breakable, chalky grey-pinkish limestone. Schilfsandstein stones are larger, yellow-brownish. Kieselsandstein limestone is almost rusty red, still breakable and chalky, with a waxy feel to the touch. Stubensandstein rocks are dark, huge and hard. Incidentally "stuben" is a reference to rooms, since this is the stone one sands the floors with. These descriptions of various incarnations of limestone will be of varying importance to the taster, but to me they are a big deal, and a testament to the quality of Beurer's wines, in how they can be visualized in terms of their respective mineral composition, and to what extent the minerals dominate the structure of the wine and for how long - on the palate, and with bottle age - before they break up and yield to secondary fruits, or give way to more earthy aromas.
As to the wines, they are quite unique. They are certainly unusual as far as dry Riesling goes nowadays. There is not a trace of the severity of slate grown dry German riesling, nor of the overt exotic nature of ripeness found in Rheinhessen or Wachau, or of the size of typical Alsacian Rieslings with this much flavour. In fact they are unusual for *any* Riesling I am aware of because the expression of dirt they convey reminds me more of Chardonnay from Jura or Chablis than anything else. This was especially apparent in a couple of 2008s that Jochen opened at the conclusion of our visit, which is why I would like to start with those two wines, and then address the younger stuff, hopefully in some context.
The two 2008s were Kieselsandstein and Junges Schwaben, which comes from a 1 ha plot of 40 year old vines in Kiesel. Kieselsandstein is no longer primary but still quite fresh, with an indication of smoky, stony aromas beginning to fold and allowing secondary notes to emerge. It's very bouncy on the palate, dry, stony, phenolic, with a touch of CO2. I find it impressively delineated and honest in its purity. The structure is mostly that of a young wine, but the fruits are just starting to give in to secondary development, acquiring some warmth. The Junges Schwaben is quite a revelation. At its 12.5% abv, it maintains rigid minerality but is no longer monolithic. It's cool, delineated, with plenty of phenolic material on display, very well integrated into warm-fruited yet brisk media. JS is a ripe wine, but there are no peaches or any heat whatsoever in a slightly fuzzy, complex finish. Holding this wine in the glass reveals aromas of sea shell and coffee cake (typical Riesling, right?), an impression which finds its way onto the palate with wonderfully ripe yellow flavours on a finely grained chalky base, very much like an older Chablis. Unlike other wines here which are raised in stainless steel, JS comes from 1200 liter fuders.
On to younger wines, mostly 2011s. I should note that, generally speaking, 2011 as a vintage may have a softer side to it, compared to say 08, 10 and most likely 12 here. Which made the wines that much more impressive, given their balance, raciness, shape. I should also point out that fatboy and I scored an 09 Junges Schwaben in a restaurant later that evening, which was certainly the ripest version of the bottling I am yet to cross paths with, and yet, once again, it was shockingly cool and balanced in the finish. What's up with that.
Beurer's 2012 "basic riesling" (not sure what this will be bottles as) came from tank, and despite being slightly cloudy still, it gave me a hint of the insanity I would be experiencing for 4 days to follow, in the MSR, Nahe and Rheinhessen. This is just a wonderful vintage and this wine gave us flowers with fabulous red fruit sweetness on the nose; brilliant acidity, red fruit, sweet white flower perfume in midpalate, and an even brighter delineated finish, with green apple skins and red berries. 6gm RS, 12.3% abv. Did I mention red fruit?
2011 Gipskeuper , from Stettener Häder - starting out somewhat ripe and round on the nose, this is slightly peachy at first, but clearing up very quickly, giving way to bright yet spherical ripeness(*). There are saline minerals here. and a slightly superficial fatty palate feel, on top of a steely base. Cool, superbly balanced. Finish not yet defined by very discernible flavours but in stone and mineral, decent acidity and fine shape. It strikes me that the granularity of minerals here is just right for the fruit and the two will recede most harmoniously. 11.5% abv, 6gm RS, from an ecosystem that has lots of herbs and flowers in topsoil.
(*) this juice reminded me of 2010 Kiesel consumed earlier in the week. It too had peachy elements early on, but you would have never guessed an hour later - clean, tensile, racy.
2011 Schilfsandstein - Yellow fruit nose, floral sweetness less obvious than in Keuper, there are stalks at play. Mineral is larger scaled but also dusty in the tail of aromas. Power of ripeness and minerals on the palate, with very good acids, and a touch of quarz like inner mouth perfume. Tangy long finish. 12% abv, 4g RS. Usually takes a year longer than Keuper to show itself, says Jochen. This stupid note sounds like it needs points.
Same wine opened 1 day earlier: More mellow, rounded, even more yellow fruits. Sweeter, less chiseled, less delineated by acids.
Same wine opened 6 days earlier: Back to the smoky mineral top note and yet here mineral is decomposed into a nice mineral/fruit sauce mixture, more acid in finish again, quite long. (fb and Jochen preferred 1 day old version, but I liked this more).
2011 Stubensandstein - a most spherical but cool, yellow-fruited nose, which is just a touch sticky. More powerful and ripe on the palate, with a slight sensation of glycerol in midpalate, but an impeccably balanced finish. Nicely laced with white floral tones in the mouth. There is a lot more to looking at them big rocks than the power of suggestion. 13% abv, from south to SE exposure.
2011 Junges Schwaben. Multi-dimensional nose: front end is ripe, tail quite cool. Ironically you feel more sulfur on the palate here. Some stems used, 5-6 days on skins. Really fantastic quality of tannins. Plenty of baby fat, especially on entrance. This one sits and develops on the palate nicely. Best part is development of red fruit on the finish. 3-5gm RS.
One of these days or weeks: a visit to Andi Knauss and some random Holger Koch bottles.