originally posted by .sasha:
Le Mont demi-sec is inspiring.
originally posted by Brad Kane:
I've never had a premoxed sweet Loire Chenin.
originally posted by SFJoe:
originally posted by Brad Kane:
I've never had a premoxed sweet Loire Chenin.
You provide an interesting case for sampling error.
If I made such an assertion, someone could say, "well, you drink a case of demi-sec or sec for every bottle of sweet wine, so what do you know?"
But from you, that means something empirically.
Although, upthread you will find reasons why that might be so anyway.
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
I opened a HL sec a couple of years ago that was alluring, but that was before the scary data began pouring in, so to speak.
originally posted by SFJoe:
I had a p'oxed 2002 Le Mont sec recently, fwiw.
It got hot up there??originally posted by mark e:
West Marin
I had one of those.originally posted by .sasha:
and how about a perfect 96 Le Mont Sec, reported by Jeff in another thread.
originally posted by .sasha:
and how about a perfect 96 Le Mont Sec, reported by Jeff in another thread.
originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by .sasha:
and how about a perfect 96 Le Mont Sec, reported by Jeff in another thread.
I have a couple of those. Good stuff. However, the '95 sec and demi are also showing premox, as well as beautiful bottles.
originally posted by SFJoe:
It got hot up there??originally posted by mark e:
West Marin