With friends . . .

Florida Jim

Florida Jim
2004 Dom. Leroy, Bourgogne:
I bought a case of this before folks realized it wasn’t simple Bourgogne and the price doubled. Over the years, I have opened bottles that were pleasant and others that were not but none that ever showed any indication of declassed 1er juice. Until now.
Still has the herbal edge but now the fruit is nuanced and has some depth, the finesse is evident in the mouthfeel and it has an admirable finish. Quite nice.

1999 Chevillon, N-S-G Les Cailles:
Opened and decanted it showed so much reduction as to be undrinkable; left it in the decanter over five hours there was no change. Put it back in the bottle and left it in the cellar for three nights.
Poured on the fourth day the reduction had dissipated but it was closed and the tannins were drying. Waited an hour.
Hello Burgundy; full, rich dark fruit, good integration and grip without the drying tannins and a terrific texture. Yummy.
‘Hard to wait.

2010 Chateau de Maligny, Chablis VV:
Lovely, lovely wine. And less than $20.

N/V Cédric Bouchard, Champagne Inflorescence La Parcelle:
A blanc de noir that has a hint of color, an exuberant bead and maturing flavors. Perhaps, the most complex palate I have ever gotten out of bubbly and it has that ever so slight hint of oxidation that suggests nuts. Layered as well as thirst quenching. It was a day to celebrate and this was precisely right to the occasion.

1998 Trimbach, Riesling Clos St. Hune:
Premoxed.
(Aside: Listening to the continuing problem in Burgundy has made me gun-shy, but finding premox in Clos St. Hune just makes me angry. This is beyond frustrating.)

2010 Occhipinti, il Frappato:
At first, a little disjointed but after about an hour, all the wine one could ever want. “The way wine should taste.”

2010 Las Vides, Torrontes:
Aromatic and crisp with melon and floral notes; pretty wine.

1997 Talley, Pinot Noir Rosemary’s Vineyard:
Well resolved and showing some development; not yet tertiary but nicely complex; earthy and integrated with good balance and sustain. Quiet but a complete wine and very enjoyable.

1995 Chateau Margaux:
Needs substantial decanter time but is beginning to open and show its breed; layered, supple yet focused and perfectly balanced. Very young but very good.

Best, Jim
 
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
I think (1) Chevillon's wines need a long time from most vintages, and (2) most 1999s are not in a good place right now.

I disagree. I think of all the serious Nuits producers, Chevillons are the most approachable young, especially the Cailles.
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
I think (1) Chevillon's wines need a long time from most vintages, and (2) most 1999s are not in a good place right now.

I disagree. I think of all the serious Nuits producers, Chevillons are the most approachable young, especially the Cailles.

Paging fb.
 
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Claude Kolm:
I think (1) Chevillon's wines need a long time from most vintages, and (2) most 1999s are not in a good place right now.

I disagree. I think of all the serious Nuits producers, Chevillons are the most approachable young, especially the Cailles.

That's a relative statement -- saying that his wines come around earlier than those of Faiveley, Gouges, and Chauvenet isn't saying a whole lot (although all three have been making efforts to make at least some of their wines more accessible earlier). And once one gets beyond those three, I think most other top producers of Nuits (many of whom are located in other communes) have wines that I'd expect to come around more quickly than those of Chevillon.

Surely as a terroir, Cailles will come around earlier than Vaucrains (not sure about LSG, though), but certainly the Côte de Vosne wines (Bousselots, Chaignots) come around earlier than the central Nuits wines, and one can argue that Perrières and Roncières come around earlier than Cailles, too.
 
originally posted by Florida Jim:
originally posted by kirk wallace:
ParcelleJim, was the Bouchard the current release of the Parcelle, which is from '05 fruit, I think, or an earlier one?
Earlier.
Best, Jim

Ah. Do you know whether it was '02 or '03? I've had a bunch of bottles of the '02, and a few '05s, but i don't think i've opened any of the '03s.
 
Last night, for my birthday, 1998 Clos St. Hune gave me a big dose of premox as a present. Thanks, Clos St. Hune.

(We drank some Vilmart instead.)
 
originally posted by Michael Lewis:
Last night, for my birthday, 1998 Clos St. Hune gave me a big dose of premox as a present. Thanks, Clos St. Hune.

(We drank some Vilmart instead.)

I feel your pain.
 
originally posted by Michael Lewis:
Last night, for my birthday, 1998 Clos St. Hune gave me a big dose of premox as a present. Thanks, Clos St. Hune.
Last night, for your birthday, 1998 Clos Ste. Hune was brilliant, perfect, saline, precise.

The uncertainty is the second-worst part.
 
Yes, the uncertainty is quite restrictive in a way. At home, teh p'ox is a terrible disappointment, but I can easily open something else. On the other hand, I don't feel comfortable bringing a bottle to a jeebus when there have been reports of premox for that particular wine or category of wine. I had wanted to open this '98 CSH for awhile, but waited until a quiet birthday dinner at home precisely for this reason.
 
Back
Top