Chris Kissack & Jim Budd banned from tasting Huet's 2013s.

Can someone link to an exposé of the breakup with Pinguet?

I remember talk of it and the broadest of outlines, but if there is something with quotes and facts, I'd love to read it.
 
FWIW, I find this surprising. I've never met Sarah, but Tony was always extremely gracious and generous with his time with me.
 
originally posted by VLM:
FWIW, I find this surprising. I've never met Sarah, but Tony was always extremely gracious and generous with his time with me.

Same here, the one time I interacted with him while scheduling my visit to the domaine.

I was hoping to meet Sarah last month at a dinner a mutual friend was putting together, but it fell through due to a scheduling conflict.
 
originally posted by VLM:
Can someone link to an exposé of the breakup with Pinguet?

I remember talk of it and the broadest of outlines, but if there is something with quotes and facts, I'd love to read it.

Jim

Chris

Let Google be your friend, monkey boy.
 
originally posted by VLM:
FWIW, I find this surprising. I've never met Sarah, but Tony was always extremely gracious and generous with his time with me.

Everyone who has met him has said that Tony is a true, gracious, gentleman. That doesn't seem to be where the problem is.
 
originally posted by VLM:
FWIW, I find this surprising. I've never met Sarah, but Tony was always extremely gracious and generous with his time with me.

Did you reply to my question in the other thread?
 
I was over in Sonoma this morning and while picking up wine talked to Barry H. who runs Rare Wine on the west coast. He was unaware of the depth of the arguement that took place and the ongoing conversations created on the internet. He was honestly perplexed why anyone would bite their own ass like Huet seems to have done. Barry said he would look into the hassle, seeing as they do a pretty good amount of business with the Huet line out here.
 
I was over in Sonoma this morning and while picking up wine talked to Barry H. who runs Rare Wine on the west coast. He was unaware of the depth of the arguement that took place and the ongoing conversations created on the internet. He was honestly perplexed why anyone would bite their own ass like Huet seems to have done. Barry said he would look into the hassle, seeing as they do a pretty good amount of business with the Huet line out here.
 
originally posted by SteveTimko:
It would be nice if Huet would take the time to issue a statement to explain their side.

"Well, my dad has all the talent, money, and manners. I just like ragging on the internet dweebs that hang around the table. I even make them stop typing so they can't get me on snapchat! Wanna go grab a couple PBRs?"
 
Shouldn't young people understand the power of blogs, and Internet posting and shit going viral? I thought only us old folk made stupid mistakes like this.
 
originally posted by Bill Lundstrom:
Shouldn't young people understand the power of blogs, and Internet posting and shit going viral? I thought only us old folk made stupid mistakes like this.

Well, the techniques, yes; the collateral implications, not so much. It also takes many people quite a few years to grow into their emotions.
 
originally posted by Ian Fitzsimmons:
originally posted by SFJoe:
I suspect that the sensitivity was more around the discussion of Pinguet's departure than around the reviews of particular wines.

[...]

It's easy to get the impression that Hwang the younger has difficulty disaggregating a detached assessment of the wines from loyalty (imagined or not) to Pinguet.
Jersey girl. Them bitches cray.
 
I've been in contact with a friend, an acquaintance of Tony Hwang, who played a small role in the sale of Huet. Here's what he had to say:

As a fan of Huët's wines but which I knew to be in some disarray as a company, I thought that Tony - an unconditional fan of sweet wines - would be a good person to take over. However, his track record - firstly with Szépsy and then with Pinguet makes me suspect that either they, or he had unrealistic expectations of the other. He is/was without an extremely tough cookie, and will have made it perfectly clear that he expected the companies in which he invested to make money. If they didn't make as much as he expected, then either his expectations were unrealisable in practice (especially given the recession) or else his managers didn't believe he'd be as tough as he said he would. Certainly, when he has [sic] his bust up with Szépsy, Pinguet could do no wrong.
[...]
The comments about making more dry white, on the other hand, are entirely consistent with what happened at Királyudvár. Without going into a long history lesson, Tokaji Aszu is expensive to make partly because of the rules relating to fermentation times. He first of all started making a number of cuvées which did NOT have these long delays, made from botrytised grapes. He also made a dry Furmint based wine which at one time caused a sensation in terms of quality. And now we hear that he and Pinguet may have fallen out over the proprtion of time and effort going into dry wines. with Pinguet apparently wanting to put more emphasis on the sweet wines for which Huët was rightly famous. What I don't know is which came first, the chicken or the egg. Ie did Tony walk away saying to himself "I've more important fish to fry than to fight with Pinguet" (which he might well have had) - installing his kids to take over, or did he feel that he could no longer afford the time and effort in Huët because of increasing pressure of work in other areas, and in installing his children, unwittingly cause the inevitable ructions which could be down to something as silly as the fact that they don't necessarily share his passion for sweet wine.

He's currently trying to get some comment from Tony Hwang about this whole kerfuffle.

Mark Lipton
 
La Revue du Vin de France has a quote from Sarah Hwang at http://www.larvf.com/,vin-domaine-h...gers-salon-des-vins-de-loire-vins,4363775.asp. Loosely translated (which is about as much as my rusty French will allow, so I welcome corrections from the more fluent), she concludes that she has chosen to defend the domaine, her team, and Vouvray. If she honestly believes that Vouvray needs defending from Kissack and Budd, two of the staunchest advocates for the region in the English language press, then her life to date must have been so privileged and sheltered that I almost pity her. Her justification suggests that she lacks the maturity and sense of perspective to supervise a sunglasses kiosk at a suburban mall, much less a historically great domaine. Heaven forbid she ever experiences a genuine adversary.

I doubt she believes that she is defending Vouvray, however. More likely, her statement is calculated to cloak her poor decision in a mantle of regional pride and some degree of anti-Anglophone sentiment, which would be despicable instead of merely pathetic.

I hope to see a more detailed statement from Ms. Hwang that proves that I've misjudged her, but I'm not holding my breath.
 
On a weird note, the article claims that neither Budd nor Kissack have been barred from the domaine: "Ils ne sont pas interdits de visite au domaine." So they can't taste at the Salon des vins de Loire but they can come to the estate? This does not add up. She says she decided to speak out to defend the domaine, the team, and Vouvray: "j'ai fait le choix de ne plus me taire pour défendre le domaine, notre équipe, et Vouvray."
 
Back
Top