originally posted by Brad Kane:
originally posted by Michael Lewis:
Brad just about invented the whole idea of [CENSORED] when he published a peer-reviewed study of 2002 Huet in the journal Science. Fuck that. Great teachers do not impart wisdom that way, and they sure as shit don't make it so obvious that they want the world to think they are great teachers. We are all in a perpetual state of learning about wine, so more humility ought to be required from a guy that still doesn't understand why anyone likes mature red Burgundy.
What a stupid statement, Michael. I went through how I went about deducing that there were [CENSORED] issues with much of the '02 Huet line. It's called building a case. Aren't you a lawyer? Don't you know how to do that, or do you get your evidence from one source and loudly yell, "I rest my case!"
Getting back to the original point, Jonathan, about the age. Just because the '89 and '90 L d'Or are still good, doesn't mean that's the normal aging curve. Personally, I find the curve shorter and, for that matter, with regard to the '89, I think it drank a lot better ten years ago than it has anytime since. At age fourteen, as this '02 is, even the best Muscadet just aren't young.