2013 Tempier rose

originally posted by Michael Lewis:
originally posted by VLM:
originally posted by Michael Lewis:
I am going to go further. It is the Platonic form of rose.

I finally sat down with an entire bottle of this. Holy crap, is it good.

In addition, I think that this is a perfectly acceptable use of form in Plato's sense, although I suppose the form itself never has a material instantiation.

I gave some further thought to my use of the Platonic form in this context. And I have concluded that the wine is so perfect as to be a material instantiation of the Platonic form, notwithstanding the traditional understanding that the Platonic form cannot have a material instantiation. Put differently, it is so great that it warped the philosophical universe. Maybe the actual universe too. Mind: blown.

I now understand what Parker means when he says "100 points!" He was talking about Platonic forms the whole time and I just didn't know.

So now I'm forced to reply. Material incarnations are Hegelian, not Platonic. What you seem to want to say is that the wine is the Hegelian Absolute of Rose.
 
Back
Top