First of all, the FN has softened itself to a protest against immigration policies and radical Islamism and downplays the old man's anti-semitic right wing post WWII revanchism. But even at that, it's a party whose strength is racism (just anti-North African now). It has a populist, for white's only, support for left labor and social policies. But nobody really takes that seriously. The FN, unlike the tea party, is not dedicated to failed and stupid policies. It is dedicated still to a white France and its support, for better or worse,is that. Lot's of decent people, in the wake of Charlie Hebdo and other islamist attacks in Europe, and indeed the growing anti-semitism of the North African population, support FN as a response. They are deluded. I don't necessarily think I should boycott them. Some of them are my neighbors and they are decent human beings. But I don't think I have to believe or act like the FN isn't still a racist party.
I like Cliff's resistance to Taitinger as quaint, but it is too far back. Too many grandchildren in France and Germany would have to dispossess themselves of property in a way that might call for entire states in the US to give themselves over to Native American territory in satisfaction of treaties still in effect, for me really to go that far. But history is always instructive. Really the issue is never who owned what or who did what to who but what are we going to do about it now.