originally posted by georg lauer:
originally posted by Tom Blach:
I certainly wouldn't deny that German non-dry Riesling works superbly at the table but it doesn't need food to be comprehensible.
I would.
I have heard many times how the Prüms serve old (and much less overtly sweet) Auslese with their stag roast. But just like any other off dry Riesling, I likely would have enough after one glass, even as I can imagine it going well with the pear and boysenberries they serve with it.
It puzzles me how food friendly these wines are seen by some, an idea mostly limited to the US. Even with Asian food they only work occasionally for me and I usually much prefer the dryer wines we also open, Riesling and things like Scheurebe or Muskateller. I find this especially the case for current Rieslings that are not aged, which are in the majority much sweeter than they used to be 40 years ago when most of today’s Kabinetts would have been labeled Spät- or Auslese (a recent swing back by certain wineries notwithstanding). There is often a claim in the anglophone world that Kabinett does not really taste sweet because of its bracing acidity, which to me is just bizarre. I remember a meal in one of the German three star restaurants (famous for its japanified modern French cuisine) where the Sommelière was famous for serving off dry Riesling throughout the meal. We stopped enjoying this already before the amuse geules were finished and soon after we begged for mercy.
Just to be clear, I totally see the appeal and quality of these wines. I used to buy them regularly. But they all sit untouched in my cellar as we never find a find a reason to drink them and I have started to give them away.